Difference between revisions of "Minutes - FHIR Validation Group 2020-10-15"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Review and Approve Agenda | * Review and Approve Agenda | ||
* Updates on action items | * Updates on action items | ||
| + | * Use of SNOMED CT | ||
* New Project: ScoreResult | * New Project: ScoreResult | ||
| − | * | + | * Other profiles (Patient Will, etc.) |
| + | * BE Core profiles | ||
* Backlog review / update | * Backlog review / update | ||
== Participants == | == Participants == | ||
| − | * | + | * Anne Nerenhausen |
| + | * Robin Bosman | ||
| + | * Hanne Vuegen | ||
| + | * Ingrid Mertens | ||
| + | * Filoretta Velica | ||
| + | * Felix de Tavernier | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
| − | === Score Result profile | + | == Discussion on SNOMED CT usage == |
| − | The current version of the | + | * Do we use SNOMED CT codes in our profiles? |
| − | + | ** Dedicated Slices or not? - only if you want to guide implementers or force behaviour, e.g. if one of the slices is mandatory. | |
| + | ** Challenge from Ingrid: How can we express: | ||
| + | *** "this valueset is for our 300 substances, but it's extensible - but only for substances anyway" | ||
| + | *** information on slicing: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/profiling.html#slicing | ||
| + | * Discussion on use of different codesystems: | ||
| + | ** We prefer to use interntaional codes | ||
| + | ** For some codes, we can either make an extension, or we eventually make a mapping. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Score Result profile == | ||
| + | The current version of the BeScoreResult profile can be seen [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/riziv-inami/StructureDefinition-be-scoreresult.html#tabs-diff here]. | ||
| + | * Discussion: we need a project proposal where this is explicitly mentioned - a new project proposal, specific for - ScoreResults (and associated valuesets/codesystem), and LMs, etc. | ||
| + | ** RIZIV/INAMI will prepare a Project Proposal | ||
| + | ** When ready, José to ask Karlien to invite the entire Belgian community to see if they want to join a Validation meeting | ||
| + | ** '''José will capture a first idea''' of how to govern this Validation group going open (e.g. voting rights etc.) - on a Google document | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Other profiles == | ||
| + | Profiles related to "modular summary" | ||
| + | * We want to have these profiles ready to use by the end of next year, so we will prepare the official publication | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Core BE profiles == | ||
| + | * We want to ensure that we use the BE profiles consistently | ||
| + | ** BePatient | ||
| + | ** BePractitioner | ||
| + | ** BePractitionerRole | ||
| + | ** BeOrganization | ||
| + | * Do we want to make specific profiles and constraints for the vaults? | ||
| + | * Hanne to bring some examples of requirements on possible constraints. | ||
[[HL7 Belgium Validation Workgroup]] | [[HL7 Belgium Validation Workgroup]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:32, 15 October 2020
Thursday, 15th October 2020, 09:30 CET
Contents
Agenda
- Welcome
- Review and Approve Agenda
- Updates on action items
- Use of SNOMED CT
- New Project: ScoreResult
- Other profiles (Patient Will, etc.)
- BE Core profiles
- Backlog review / update
Participants
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Robin Bosman
- Hanne Vuegen
- Ingrid Mertens
- Filoretta Velica
- Felix de Tavernier
Minutes
Discussion on SNOMED CT usage
- Do we use SNOMED CT codes in our profiles?
- Dedicated Slices or not? - only if you want to guide implementers or force behaviour, e.g. if one of the slices is mandatory.
- Challenge from Ingrid: How can we express:
- "this valueset is for our 300 substances, but it's extensible - but only for substances anyway"
- information on slicing: https://www.hl7.org/fhir/profiling.html#slicing
- Discussion on use of different codesystems:
- We prefer to use interntaional codes
- For some codes, we can either make an extension, or we eventually make a mapping.
Score Result profile
The current version of the BeScoreResult profile can be seen here.
- Discussion: we need a project proposal where this is explicitly mentioned - a new project proposal, specific for - ScoreResults (and associated valuesets/codesystem), and LMs, etc.
- RIZIV/INAMI will prepare a Project Proposal
- When ready, José to ask Karlien to invite the entire Belgian community to see if they want to join a Validation meeting
- José will capture a first idea of how to govern this Validation group going open (e.g. voting rights etc.) - on a Google document
Other profiles
Profiles related to "modular summary"
- We want to have these profiles ready to use by the end of next year, so we will prepare the official publication
Core BE profiles
- We want to ensure that we use the BE profiles consistently
- BePatient
- BePractitioner
- BePractitionerRole
- BeOrganization
- Do we want to make specific profiles and constraints for the vaults?
- Hanne to bring some examples of requirements on possible constraints.
