Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Population Health WG 2022-11-22"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
(Created page with "=== Attendees === * Bart Decuypere * Brecht Van Vooren * Hanne Vuegen * Jean-Michel Polfliet * Karlien Erauw * Kurt Dhaene * Patrick Beyltjens === Excused === * José Costa T...")
 
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* Issues overview
 
* Issues overview
 
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/14 Issue #14]: it is a Flemisch screening - how to deal with translations  
 
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/14 Issue #14]: it is a Flemisch screening - how to deal with translations  
 +
::* content can be translated
 +
::* there is no standard translation for the fields but cannot be determined today and will have to be dealt with with end user
 +
::*  if needed it will be adressed in the guidance
  
 +
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/13 Issue #13]: flow for identification
 +
::* sender and receiver have to agree
 +
::* sender can give UUID, receiver decides what to do with it and include it when sending info back
 +
::* WG agrees with the UUID proposal
 +
 +
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/13 Issue #13]: confirm follow up advice
 +
::* currently only follow up advice for colon cancer ; there is a snomed CT code for colonoscopy
 +
::* follow-up advice for patient if screening has deviating results
 +
::* objective is to include follow up advice upon breast cancer screenings ; follow up advice should be aligned with what is written in the letter to the GP/gyn, to check if snomed CT codes exist
 +
 +
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/11 Issue #11]: review references to resources
 +
::* the references to Be-profiles have to be added wherever appropriate
 +
 +
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/10 Issue #10]: actors & transactions
 +
::* Kurt is going to prepare the necessary info for next WG meeting
 +
 +
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues/11 Issue #9]: BeObservation
 +
::*
  
 
* Is the rework on the logical model finished, available here: https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/public-health/branches/issue-1/StructureDefinition-BePopulationScreening.html  
 
* Is the rework on the logical model finished, available here: https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/public-health/branches/issue-1/StructureDefinition-BePopulationScreening.html  
Line 41: Line 62:
  
 
=== Date next meeting ===
 
=== Date next meeting ===
* Tuesday at 10AM
+
* Tuesday 6 Dec at 10AM

Revision as of 09:37, 22 November 2022

Attendees

  • Bart Decuypere
  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Kurt Dhaene
  • Patrick Beyltjens

Excused

  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Veerle Michiels

Agenda

  • Resolution of issues

Minutes

  • Rework of Logical model has finished
  • Issues overview
  • Issue #14: it is a Flemisch screening - how to deal with translations
  • content can be translated
  • there is no standard translation for the fields but cannot be determined today and will have to be dealt with with end user
  • if needed it will be adressed in the guidance
  • sender and receiver have to agree
  • sender can give UUID, receiver decides what to do with it and include it when sending info back
  • WG agrees with the UUID proposal
  • currently only follow up advice for colon cancer ; there is a snomed CT code for colonoscopy
  • follow-up advice for patient if screening has deviating results
  • objective is to include follow up advice upon breast cancer screenings ; follow up advice should be aligned with what is written in the letter to the GP/gyn, to check if snomed CT codes exist
  • the references to Be-profiles have to be added wherever appropriate
  • Kurt is going to prepare the necessary info for next WG meeting
  • mandatory fields: code
  • mustSupport fields: language, identifier, status, category, code, (most probably not needed: hasMember, derivedFrom)
  • are there LOINC codes for the tests that are being done ?
  • the only observation that will be shared is "afwijking", so only code
  • recommendation: make it only dependent on BeObservation so the WG core has to add a logical model for BeObservation
  • issue #8 nextInvitationIndication: currently there is a text, expectation for the patient when to expect his next appointment
  • it seems that there is currently no business need to structure this, it also depends on the advices from SKR
  • more investigation has to be done, check now which current "texts" are currently used

Action Items

  • resolution of open issues

Date next meeting

  • Tuesday 6 Dec at 10AM