View source for Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-08-24

=== Attendees ===
* Anne Nerenhausen
* Alexis Van Zeveren
* Bart Decuypere 
* Félix De Tavernier
* Hanne Vuegen
* Hans De Keersmaeker
* Jean-Michel Polfliet
* Karlien Erauw
* Pablo Christiaens
* Sam Jocqué

=== Excused ===
* Brecht Van Vooren
* Filoretta Velica 
* Isabelle Pollet
* Jens Penny
* José Costa Teixeira 
* Nick Hermans
* Philippe Baise
* Tom De Backer
* Veerle Michiels
* Walter Bollaert 

=== Agenda ===
* Review business rules document & resolve issue/questions

=== Minutes ===
* A new version of the business rules document has been distributed to the WG members last Monday [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QGEKMd4OkXJRIr-EC2qeaqg84Bw5G7gj/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=105469359652835948544&rtpof=true&sd=true in NL] and [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Avg27yw7gJB0KqfOhqh5vLsj2187Y8e-/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=105469359652835948544&rtpof=true&sd=true French]:
::* see also in [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/12 issue 12]
::* we go briefly over the document
::* please have a look at the document and raise your questions or remarks by next meeting

* The work on the implementation guide has started
::* [https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/patientwill/branches/issue-1/ issue 1 refers to the work on the logical model]

* We deal with the questions raised in [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues issues, see here]
::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/11 issue 11]: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
::::* the will code will be made mandatory in the logical model as this corresponds with the most important information, it corresponds with consent provision code in FHIR
::::* [https://hl7.org/FHIR/R4/valueset-consent-scope.html the category is FHIR int'l model] is mandatory and is very similar to scope
::::* more investigation is necessary by eHealth platform

::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/10 issue 10]: performer vs organisation
::::* the representative (mandaathouder) is in the logical model but not in the IG yet --> it is the custodian
::::* where do we get the INSZ number for a notary/judge ?
::::* do we need another type of representative ? trusted person?
::::* can the custodian be the same person as the performer ? normally not
::::* concepts need to be clarified by INAMI

::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/9 issue 9]: update/remove links to artefacts
::::* it is a temporary version of the IG, the links will be updated by eHealth platform 

::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/8 issue 8]: kmehr/FHIR mapping
::::* for all existing documents in kmehr and the valuesets used there, a mapping to the FHIR valuesets is needed
::::* how are we going to tackle this ?
::::::* see 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 in the business rules WillCategory and WillCode
::::::* we will only add values to the existing kmehr values
::::::::* it seems that some kmehr values have been removed and some have not been mapped
::::* the mapping will be present in the business rules document
::::::* where will the mapping be made available ?

* royal decree stated to implement the advance cared planning by July but this is not feasible, will be for next year
* There is a need to have a complete overview of how caresets will have to be exchanged in the Belgian eHealth ecosystem. This is out of scope of this WG but will need to be tackled.
 

* Next actions:
::* come prepared with remarks on the updated business rules document and first draft of logical model by 7 Sep
::* once the Royal Decree and other relevant documents (brochure) are available, they will be distributed to the WG members

'''Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 7 Sep at 9AM'''