Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-05-29
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 07:11, 29 May 2024 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs)
Contents
Attendees
- Bart Decuypere
- Benny Verhamme
- Brian Thieren
- Dominiek Leclerq
- Elien De Koker
- Félix De Tavernier
- Ivan Coppieters
- Jacques Yakoub
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Karlien Erauw
- Lodewijk Sioen
- Maxime Caucheteur
- Pablo Christiaens
- Philippe Baise
- Steven Van den Berghe
- Werner De Mulder
Excused/Not present
- Annabel Dompas
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Anthony Maton
- Benny Verhamme
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Cyprien Janssens
- Didier Temans
- Erwin Bellon
- Filoretta Velica
- Hanne Vuegen
- Isabelle Pollet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Marcelo Romero-Cors
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Philip Sidgwick
- Ruben Walraevens
- Stef Hoofd
Agenda
- updates & resolution of issues
Minutes
- Version 2.1.0 has been published on 3 May, see here
- We are now working on version 2.1.0, these will also fix the qa issues
- resolution of issues
- changes made to resolve isolutions discussed last week are being proposed
- changes have been made to resolve issue 105
- codeable concept instead of valueset for gender at birth: same values from FHIR administrative-generic have been added: male, female, other, unknown (both as medical condition so this can be specified as "other")
- for social gender there is an existing extension (patietn_genderIdentity), social gender is present in the logical model
- death still needs to be changed into deceased
- we look again at the logical model for the patient
- no remarks on the logical model from the WG members
- issue 78 on Related person
- work on logical model has to be finished, it needs some more thoughts by all
- issue 76 Document reference and kmher
- main goal is to express in a FHIR resource the kmehr metadata for the document, or we might need a mapping
- Felix will add an example to this issue to clarify it
- issue 39: BeOrganization has a slice for NISS number
- can we remove it ? but if it is used for a specific use case, it won't be possible anymore ; we don't see the use case for it
- risk of removing it, is low, so slice will be removed, issue can be closed afterwards
- issue 32: it is used by NIC, this needs to be discussed with people from COBRHA and RIZIV
- issue 22: eHealth PF will write a proposal for a clearer description. The WG will approve afterwards.
- issue 23: question is being clarified in the issue and issue can be closed
Next agenda meeting agenda points
- Continue resolving of issues
Next meeting
- Wednesday 12 June at 9AM