Difference between revisions of "Minutes - PSS FHIR WG 2024-05-31"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Attendees === | === Attendees === | ||
− | |||
* Alexis Van Zeveren | * Alexis Van Zeveren | ||
− | * | + | * Anne Nerenhausen |
* Bart Cornelissen | * Bart Cornelissen | ||
* Bart Decuypere | * Bart Decuypere | ||
− | * | + | * Cliff De Clerck |
+ | * Fabrice Claes | ||
* Frederik Lenaerts | * Frederik Lenaerts | ||
+ | * Hans De Keersmaecker | ||
* Jarno Schurmans | * Jarno Schurmans | ||
− | * Jean-Michel Polfliet | + | * Jean-Michel Polfliet |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* Jelle Michiels | * Jelle Michiels | ||
* Jeroen De Wilde | * Jeroen De Wilde | ||
Line 17: | Line 15: | ||
* José Costa Teixeira | * José Costa Teixeira | ||
* Karlien Erauw | * Karlien Erauw | ||
− | |||
* Kris Bollen | * Kris Bollen | ||
* Kristof Steurbaut | * Kristof Steurbaut | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* Loic Carlier | * Loic Carlier | ||
− | |||
* Michael Wegge | * Michael Wegge | ||
− | * | + | * Michel Lio |
+ | * Nick Sneijers | ||
* Olivier Préaux | * Olivier Préaux | ||
* Pieter Buntinck | * Pieter Buntinck | ||
− | * | + | * Werner De Mulder |
=== Excused === | === Excused === | ||
+ | * Alain Godet | ||
* Annabel Dompas | * Annabel Dompas | ||
− | |||
* Christophe Goethals | * Christophe Goethals | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* Félix De Tavernier | * Félix De Tavernier | ||
* Jens Penny | * Jens Penny | ||
Line 41: | Line 34: | ||
* Marcelo Romero-Cors | * Marcelo Romero-Cors | ||
* Mikael De Bie | * Mikael De Bie | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* Philippe Lejoly | * Philippe Lejoly | ||
* Philippe Quertemont | * Philippe Quertemont | ||
* Walter Bollaert | * Walter Bollaert | ||
− | |||
=== Agenda === | === Agenda === | ||
Line 55: | Line 45: | ||
* The logical model will be presented for feedback as from next meeting as the RIZIV project team is still working on it | * The logical model will be presented for feedback as from next meeting as the RIZIV project team is still working on it | ||
− | * Start with a condition for which you want to startup a procedure | + | * Start with a condition for which you want to startup a procedure, see diagrams [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mlls6JntDqnojCkk5BbkljX_9xW77AIV/view?usp=sharing here] and [https://drive.google.com/file/d/10_C1Z6yD_zbk29KFwnOCIrPcBa7JGi7K/view?usp=sharing here] |
::* some data will have to be provided to the PSS platform | ::* some data will have to be provided to the PSS platform | ||
− | ::::* f.e. pacemaker, | + | ::::* f.e. pacemaker, claustrophobia |
::::* therefore there will be a questionnaire first, at least in some cases | ::::* therefore there will be a questionnaire first, at least in some cases | ||
::* once the data are provided by PSS, PSS will reply | ::* once the data are provided by PSS, PSS will reply | ||
::::* order options will then be provided by PSS provided in a score | ::::* order options will then be provided by PSS provided in a score | ||
+ | ::* question on choice of physician: is new but unclear | ||
+ | ::::* will it be a BeReferral prescription or a medication request ? | ||
+ | ::::* will it be a reference (will not be anonymised) or an anonymised copy ? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::* vision is that the data sent to PSS will not contain patient data | ||
+ | ::::* information will be exchanged but without reference to the patient | ||
+ | ::::* use of pseudonymization service will not be necessary | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::* user conclusion: has not been sufficiently documented, will be in the next version of the business rules, it will normally refer to existing caresets | ||
+ | ::::* will it be returned to PSS that the HCP has followed the recommendations | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::* We look into the open issues on the [https://github.com/hl7-be/pss/issues/ github] | ||
+ | ::::* almost all are related to the project team's ongoing work and not relevant to the WG | ||
+ | ::* We propose that the WG members wait to review the business rules for the next version to be shared, will be in 2 weeks. We will discuss this in the next WG meeting. | ||
* Agenda for next meeting: | * Agenda for next meeting: | ||
::* address open questions | ::* address open questions | ||
− | ::* start work on the logical model towards the implementation guide | + | ::* start work on the logical model towards the FHIR implementation guide |
'''Next meeting Friday 14 June at 9AM ''' | '''Next meeting Friday 14 June at 9AM ''' |
Latest revision as of 07:35, 31 May 2024
Contents
Attendees
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Bart Cornelissen
- Bart Decuypere
- Cliff De Clerck
- Fabrice Claes
- Frederik Lenaerts
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Jarno Schurmans
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Jelle Michiels
- Jeroen De Wilde
- Johan Spincemaille
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Kris Bollen
- Kristof Steurbaut
- Loic Carlier
- Michael Wegge
- Michel Lio
- Nick Sneijers
- Olivier Préaux
- Pieter Buntinck
- Werner De Mulder
Excused
- Alain Godet
- Annabel Dompas
- Christophe Goethals
- Félix De Tavernier
- Jens Penny
- Loris Larazzo
- Marcelo Romero-Cors
- Mikael De Bie
- Philippe Lejoly
- Philippe Quertemont
- Walter Bollaert
Agenda
- Present functional model and start working on logical model
Minutes
- RIZIV has also shared the latest version of the PSS Business Rules us
- The logical model will be presented for feedback as from next meeting as the RIZIV project team is still working on it
- some data will have to be provided to the PSS platform
- f.e. pacemaker, claustrophobia
- therefore there will be a questionnaire first, at least in some cases
- once the data are provided by PSS, PSS will reply
- order options will then be provided by PSS provided in a score
- question on choice of physician: is new but unclear
- will it be a BeReferral prescription or a medication request ?
- will it be a reference (will not be anonymised) or an anonymised copy ?
- vision is that the data sent to PSS will not contain patient data
- information will be exchanged but without reference to the patient
- use of pseudonymization service will not be necessary
- user conclusion: has not been sufficiently documented, will be in the next version of the business rules, it will normally refer to existing caresets
- will it be returned to PSS that the HCP has followed the recommendations
- We look into the open issues on the github
- almost all are related to the project team's ongoing work and not relevant to the WG
- We propose that the WG members wait to review the business rules for the next version to be shared, will be in 2 weeks. We will discuss this in the next WG meeting.
- Agenda for next meeting:
- address open questions
- start work on the logical model towards the FHIR implementation guide
Next meeting Friday 14 June at 9AM