Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2021-03-18"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Erwin Bellon | * Erwin Bellon | ||
* Jean-Michel Polfliet | * Jean-Michel Polfliet | ||
− | * José Costa Teixeira | + | * José Costa Teixeira |
* Karlien Erauw | * Karlien Erauw | ||
− | |||
* Nick Hermans | * Nick Hermans | ||
* Pieter Devolder | * Pieter Devolder | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
* Robin Decoster | * Robin Decoster | ||
* Sander Van den Wyngaert | * Sander Van den Wyngaert | ||
+ | * Wouter Huysse | ||
===== Excused ===== | ===== Excused ===== | ||
* Elfi Goessaert | * Elfi Goessaert | ||
* Karen Anthonissen | * Karen Anthonissen | ||
+ | * Katleen Smedts | ||
* Tom Deprez | * Tom Deprez | ||
− | + | ||
===== Agenda ===== | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
* Andries is involved in the European working group op cross border exchange of medical imaging & dismissal form, project leader for FOD Volksgezondheid. This project is an extension of the CEF project that includes the summary & eprescription and is now also looking f.e. in the lab results. Andries is involved in the functional part. | * Andries is involved in the European working group op cross border exchange of medical imaging & dismissal form, project leader for FOD Volksgezondheid. This project is an extension of the CEF project that includes the summary & eprescription and is now also looking f.e. in the lab results. Andries is involved in the functional part. | ||
* Robin presents the | * Robin presents the | ||
− | ::* modifierExtension | + | ::* modifierExtension: obligatory to pass on, v3-NullFlavor can be given, example of null flavor: asked but unknown (ASKU) |
− | ::* | + | ::::* Null Flavors is HL7 concept, see values: https://terminology.hl7.org/2.1.0/CodeSystem-v3-NullFlavor.html |
+ | ::* modifierExtension BeContrastFluidUse, see http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/ValueSet-be-contrastfluid-use.html having 2 values | ||
+ | ::* reasonCode element | ||
+ | ::* see examples: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/ServiceRequest-diagnostic-imaging-basic-example-concreteWithDetails.xml.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the Belgian FHIR profile for vaccination has been used to influence the FHIR profile at European level | ||
* Erwin has composed a list with questions that mainly need to be answered by the politics | * Erwin has composed a list with questions that mainly need to be answered by the politics | ||
Line 38: | Line 44: | ||
::* modifier extension for contra indication as it is important ; with its own structure and preferrably expressed as a structure | ::* modifier extension for contra indication as it is important ; with its own structure and preferrably expressed as a structure | ||
::* supporting info: goal is that only relevant information is sent in the referral | ::* supporting info: goal is that only relevant information is sent in the referral | ||
+ | * Should/shall we enforce for Acquisition Modality: http://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part16/sect_CID_29.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Clarification by RIZIV: the referrals will be active and identical intramuros and extramuros | ||
+ | ::* however if intramuros there are additional requests, it would be fine as long as it fits in the general model | ||
+ | ::* for complex cases it might be difficult to capture all the details in the referral (f.e. 3D modelling for surgery) | ||
+ | ::* intramuros there are detailed modules for medical imaging | ||
+ | ::* a good balance will have to be sought here to avoid that we keep discusssing for years | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Robin will finalise the technical structure to finish the medical imaging referral | ||
+ | ::* can we move to a federal standard ? We will have to go through a formal request, then through the WGSE (WG Structural Elements) and the eHealth Program Board | ||
− | ''' Date Next Meeting : April | + | ''' Date Next Meeting : April 1 at 4PM which will be the final meeting re. Medical Imaging referral''' |
'''Action point:''' | '''Action point:''' | ||
* Karlien should ask for 45/60minute slot to present to 3 associations: BVR, Belg vereniging voor Nuclaire geneeskunde, BELMIP ?Karlien to take action here | * Karlien should ask for 45/60minute slot to present to 3 associations: BVR, Belg vereniging voor Nuclaire geneeskunde, BELMIP ?Karlien to take action here |
Latest revision as of 17:44, 18 March 2021
Contents
Attendees
- Andries Nelissen
- Arnaud Lippert
- Bruno Casneuf
- Erwin Bellon
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Nick Hermans
- Pieter Devolder
- Robin Bosman
- Robin Decoster
- Sander Van den Wyngaert
- Wouter Huysse
Excused
- Elfi Goessaert
- Karen Anthonissen
- Katleen Smedts
- Tom Deprez
Agenda
- Review of the updated datamodel and technical FHIR artefact
- Review of example on modalities
- Further take-up in other organisations
Minutes
- Andries is involved in the European working group op cross border exchange of medical imaging & dismissal form, project leader for FOD Volksgezondheid. This project is an extension of the CEF project that includes the summary & eprescription and is now also looking f.e. in the lab results. Andries is involved in the functional part.
- Robin presents the
- modifierExtension: obligatory to pass on, v3-NullFlavor can be given, example of null flavor: asked but unknown (ASKU)
- Null Flavors is HL7 concept, see values: https://terminology.hl7.org/2.1.0/CodeSystem-v3-NullFlavor.html
- modifierExtension BeContrastFluidUse, see http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/ValueSet-be-contrastfluid-use.html having 2 values
- reasonCode element
- see examples: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/ServiceRequest-diagnostic-imaging-basic-example-concreteWithDetails.xml.html
- the Belgian FHIR profile for vaccination has been used to influence the FHIR profile at European level
- Erwin has composed a list with questions that mainly need to be answered by the politics
- Review of the updated datamodel after the discussion in the previous WG ; unfortunately there was a technical issue with the publication
- logical model has been cleaned, heritage from BeReferralPrescription
- diagnostic questioning
- extension for codeable concept
- modifier extension for contra indication as it is important ; with its own structure and preferrably expressed as a structure
- supporting info: goal is that only relevant information is sent in the referral
- Should/shall we enforce for Acquisition Modality: http://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part16/sect_CID_29.html
- Clarification by RIZIV: the referrals will be active and identical intramuros and extramuros
- however if intramuros there are additional requests, it would be fine as long as it fits in the general model
- for complex cases it might be difficult to capture all the details in the referral (f.e. 3D modelling for surgery)
- intramuros there are detailed modules for medical imaging
- a good balance will have to be sought here to avoid that we keep discusssing for years
- Robin will finalise the technical structure to finish the medical imaging referral
- can we move to a federal standard ? We will have to go through a formal request, then through the WGSE (WG Structural Elements) and the eHealth Program Board
Date Next Meeting : April 1 at 4PM which will be the final meeting re. Medical Imaging referral
Action point:
- Karlien should ask for 45/60minute slot to present to 3 associations: BVR, Belg vereniging voor Nuclaire geneeskunde, BELMIP ?Karlien to take action here