Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Security WG 2021-06-11"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::* we look at [https://vitalink-fhir-rest-api.int.pub.vascloud.be/fhir-api/r4/metadata vitalink's capability statement] | ::* we look at [https://vitalink-fhir-rest-api.int.pub.vascloud.be/fhir-api/r4/metadata vitalink's capability statement] | ||
::* the global one/template can be extended by everyone | ::* the global one/template can be extended by everyone | ||
| + | * IAM management | ||
| + | ::* it is not an option to compose a database of all users | ||
| + | ::* hospitals: setup IBP | ||
| + | ::* pharmacies: have their own logic & system - will need to be discussed with the stakeholders | ||
| + | ::* other systems: use mostly the IAM token | ||
Revision as of 10:31, 11 June 2021
Attendees
- Bart Rondou
- Félix De Tavernier
- Hannes De Clercq
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Nick Hermans
- Pablo d'Alcantara
- Raphaël Marbaix
- Robin Bosman
Excused/Not present
- Bruno Casneuf
- Didier Temans
- Erwin Bellon
- Jan Lenie
Agenda
- Capability statements
Minutes
- A modular capability statements template would be useful
- goal is to have a draft ready by next week: a global one/template and one for allergy intolerance
- we look at vitalink's capability statement
- the global one/template can be extended by everyone
- IAM management
- it is not an option to compose a database of all users
- hospitals: setup IBP
- pharmacies: have their own logic & system - will need to be discussed with the stakeholders
- other systems: use mostly the IAM token
