Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Security WG 2021-06-11"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
::* pharmacies: have their own logic & system - will need to be discussed with the stakeholders | ::* pharmacies: have their own logic & system - will need to be discussed with the stakeholders | ||
::* other systems: use mostly the IAM token | ::* other systems: use mostly the IAM token | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Do we need code systems ? The Cobhra ones can be used | ||
| + | * We need input from the pharmacy side | ||
| + | * Hannes will try to visualize the workflow | ||
Latest revision as of 10:07, 18 June 2021
Attendees
- Bart Rondou
- Félix De Tavernier
- Hannes De Clercq
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Nick Hermans
- Pablo d'Alcantara
- Raphaël Marbaix
- Robin Bosman
Excused/Not present
- Bruno Casneuf
- Didier Temans
- Erwin Bellon
- Jan Lenie
Agenda
- Capability statements
Minutes
- A modular capability statements template would be useful
- goal is to have a draft ready by next week: a global one/template and one for allergy intolerance
- we look at vitalink's capability statement
- the global one/template can be extended by everyone
- IAM management
- it is not an option to compose a database of all users
- hospitals: setup IBP
- pharmacies: have their own logic & system - will need to be discussed with the stakeholders
- other systems: use mostly the IAM token
- Do we need code systems ? The Cobhra ones can be used
- We need input from the pharmacy side
- Hannes will try to visualize the workflow
