Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2021-11-30"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
(Created page with "===== Attendees ===== 19- * Alexis Van Zeveren (arrived late) * Dr Alain Derom * Bart Decuypere * Benny Verhamme * Frédéric Istace * Frederik Lenaerts * Hans De Keersma...")
 
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
===== Attendees ===== 19-
+
===== Attendees =====  
−
* Alexis Van Zeveren (arrived late)
 
 
* Dr Alain Derom  
 
* Dr Alain Derom  
 
* Bart Decuypere  
 
* Bart Decuypere  
−
* Benny Verhamme
 
−
* Frédéric Istace
 
 
* Frederik Lenaerts  
 
* Frederik Lenaerts  
 
* Hans De Keersmaecker  
 
* Hans De Keersmaecker  
 
* Jean-Michel Polfiet  
 
* Jean-Michel Polfiet  
 +
* Jonathan Capitano
 
* Joost Van Averbeke  
 
* Joost Van Averbeke  
−
* Jos Bellen
+
* José Schoonbroodt
 
* José Costa Teixeira  
 
* José Costa Teixeira  
 
* Karlien Erauw  
 
* Karlien Erauw  
 
* Kristof Jaubin   
 
* Kristof Jaubin   
−
* Nick Hermans
 
 
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
 
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
 +
* Olivier Lothaire
 
* Peter Laridon  
 
* Peter Laridon  
−
* Robert Nicolas (Medispring)
+
* Philippe Cauchie
 
* Thibault Mahieu  
 
* Thibault Mahieu  
 +
* Tom Fiers
 
* Tom Tollenaere  
 
* Tom Tollenaere  
 
* Stefan Waegemans  
 
* Stefan Waegemans  
−
* Toon Schiemsky
+
* Werner De Mulder
  
 
===== Excused/Not present =====  
 
===== Excused/Not present =====  
 +
* Alexic Van Zeveren
 
* Frederik De Kegel
 
* Frederik De Kegel
 +
* Jos Bellen
 
* Mieke Buckinx
 
* Mieke Buckinx
−
* Olivier Lothaire
 
 
* Paul Neyens
 
* Paul Neyens
 
* Richard Francken  
 
* Richard Francken  
 
* Theo Schumacher  
 
* Theo Schumacher  
−
* Tom Fiers
 
  
 
===== Agenda =====
 
===== Agenda =====
Line 35: Line 34:
  
 
===== Minutes =====
 
===== Minutes =====
−
* Issue on unique identifier
+
* Up-to-date list of issues can always be consulted [https://github.com/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/issues here]
 +
* Issue 19: unique identifier
 
::* naming system would be created for unique identifier for the bundle - one for Belgium
 
::* naming system would be created for unique identifier for the bundle - one for Belgium
−
::*  
+
::* how do labs need to manage amendments of protocols?
 +
::::* form of unique identifier
 +
::::* uniqueness of identifier has to be at lab level
 +
::::::* one lab will do it in this way: protocol order number + version number of the protocol, can be prefixed by the RIZIV number of the lab
 +
* Issue 40:  ServiceRequest references
 +
::* an order creates a ServiceRequest - should ServiceRequests also be stored in the DiagnosticReport.basedOn ?
 +
::::* it is not needed to duplicate the references, only put it in DiagnosticReport, if mentioned as suborders at  Observation level
 +
* Issue 28: notion of "sequence number" on specimen
 +
::* important is to be able to note unique ID of specimen, order of sampling is not useful/not relevant
 +
::* no action to be taken
 +
* Issue 20: May url references to identifier systems be empty or dummy ?
 +
::* there must also be a url that identifies the system and has to be unique within the namespace it belongs to (per lab) but it can be dummy
 +
::* it cannot be empty
 +
::* see: "If the system is a URL, it SHOULD resolve. Resolution might be to a web page that describes the identifier system and/or supports look-up of identifiers. Alternatively, it could be to a NamingSystem resource instance. Resolvable URLs are generally preferred by implementers over non-resolvable URNs, particularly opaque URNs such as OIDs (urn:oid:) or UUIDs (urn:uuid:). If used, OIDs and UUIDs may be registered in the HL7 OID registry  and SHOULD be registered if the content is shared or exchanged across institutional boundaries."
 +
::::* should : recommended, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2119
 +
::* issue was resolved last week, nothing to be done
 +
* Issue 42
 +
::* no action to be taken
 +
::* the precision that is mentioned in the FHIR message is the precision that is used by the lab
 +
* Issue 29: notion of "specimen collected after x... min"
 +
::* LOINC has different codes, these should be used by the labs, if not, then the interval has to specified separately
 +
* no action to be taken
 +
* Issue 34
 +
::* was discussed previously
 +
::* if RETAM code exist, it must be used, see https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/guidance.html, 3.10.1 Use of Retam codes
 +
::::* what with LOINC codes that are not in the RETAM table ? we should make a distinction b/w LOINC codes in RETAM table and the ones that are not - to create new issue on this so that we adapt the guidance
 +
::::* issue 34 can be closed
 +
 
  
−
'''Next Meeting:''' additional meeting on Thursday Nov 25 at 1PM to make progress
+
'''Next Meeting:''' on Tuesday Dec 7 4PM to make progress

Latest revision as of 14:56, 17 January 2022

Attendees
  • Dr Alain Derom
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Frederik Lenaerts
  • Hans De Keersmaecker
  • Jean-Michel Polfiet
  • Jonathan Capitano
  • Joost Van Averbeke
  • José Schoonbroodt
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Kristof Jaubin
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Olivier Lothaire
  • Peter Laridon
  • Philippe Cauchie
  • Thibault Mahieu
  • Tom Fiers
  • Tom Tollenaere
  • Stefan Waegemans
  • Werner De Mulder
Excused/Not present
  • Alexic Van Zeveren
  • Frederik De Kegel
  • Jos Bellen
  • Mieke Buckinx
  • Paul Neyens
  • Richard Francken
  • Theo Schumacher
Agenda
  • Rework on issues resulted from the pilot phase
Minutes
  • Up-to-date list of issues can always be consulted here
  • Issue 19: unique identifier
  • naming system would be created for unique identifier for the bundle - one for Belgium
  • how do labs need to manage amendments of protocols?
  • form of unique identifier
  • uniqueness of identifier has to be at lab level
  • one lab will do it in this way: protocol order number + version number of the protocol, can be prefixed by the RIZIV number of the lab
  • Issue 40: ServiceRequest references
  • an order creates a ServiceRequest - should ServiceRequests also be stored in the DiagnosticReport.basedOn ?
  • it is not needed to duplicate the references, only put it in DiagnosticReport, if mentioned as suborders at Observation level
  • Issue 28: notion of "sequence number" on specimen
  • important is to be able to note unique ID of specimen, order of sampling is not useful/not relevant
  • no action to be taken
  • Issue 20: May url references to identifier systems be empty or dummy ?
  • there must also be a url that identifies the system and has to be unique within the namespace it belongs to (per lab) but it can be dummy
  • it cannot be empty
  • see: "If the system is a URL, it SHOULD resolve. Resolution might be to a web page that describes the identifier system and/or supports look-up of identifiers. Alternatively, it could be to a NamingSystem resource instance. Resolvable URLs are generally preferred by implementers over non-resolvable URNs, particularly opaque URNs such as OIDs (urn:oid:) or UUIDs (urn:uuid:). If used, OIDs and UUIDs may be registered in the HL7 OID registry and SHOULD be registered if the content is shared or exchanged across institutional boundaries."
  • issue was resolved last week, nothing to be done
  • Issue 42
  • no action to be taken
  • the precision that is mentioned in the FHIR message is the precision that is used by the lab
  • Issue 29: notion of "specimen collected after x... min"
  • LOINC has different codes, these should be used by the labs, if not, then the interval has to specified separately
  • no action to be taken
  • Issue 34
  • what with LOINC codes that are not in the RETAM table ? we should make a distinction b/w LOINC codes in RETAM table and the ones that are not - to create new issue on this so that we adapt the guidance
  • issue 34 can be closed


Next Meeting: on Tuesday Dec 7 4PM to make progress

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7belgium.org/index.php?title=Minutes_-_Referral_WG_2021-11-30&oldid=1380"