Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2023-01-19"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
(Created page with "=== Attendees === * Anthony Maton * Bart Decuypere * Benjamien Schmitt * Christophe Behaegel * Cyprien Janssens * Dorsan de Fabricheckers * Geert Vandenhole * Hans De Keersma...")
 
 
Line 43: Line 43:
  
 
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/10 Issue 10 Category field ]
 
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/10 Issue 10 Category field ]
::* we use it fo differentiate the type of referral (medical imaging, nursing, ...)
+
::* we use it to differentiate the type of referral (medical imaging, nursing, ...)
 
::::* are we still going to use this or are we only going to rely on the value in the code (template in orderDetail) ? category is not mandatory at FHIR int'l level
 
::::* are we still going to use this or are we only going to rely on the value in the code (template in orderDetail) ? category is not mandatory at FHIR int'l level
 
::::* await feedback from technical meeting  
 
::::* await feedback from technical meeting  
Line 56: Line 56:
 
::* we still need to discuss on how to deal with duplicates
 
::* we still need to discuss on how to deal with duplicates
  
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/47 Issue 47  Clarification on BasedOn]
+
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/48 Issue 48 new extends extension]
::* can be closed, closed in issue 47
+
::* can be closed, linked to issue 47
  
 
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/52 Issue 52 start operation]
 
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/52 Issue 52 start operation]
Line 65: Line 65:
 
::* need feedback from Hans
 
::* need feedback from Hans
  
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/53 Issue 53 finsih operation]
+
* [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/53 Issue 53 finish operation]
 
::* similar to issue 52
 
::* similar to issue 52
::* backedn would prefer to have it in the form of FHIR resources
+
::* backend would prefer to have it in the form of FHIR resources
::* the use of an operation for the start is still under consideration
+
::* the use of an operation for the end is still under consideration
 
::* need feedback from Hans
 
::* need feedback from Hans
  

Latest revision as of 08:28, 27 January 2023

Attendees

  • Anthony Maton
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Benjamien Schmitt
  • Christophe Behaegel
  • Cyprien Janssens
  • Dorsan de Fabricheckers
  • Geert Vandenhole
  • Hans De Keersmaeker
  • Jacques Yakoub
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Julien Beard
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Maarten Cobbaert
  • Marleen Van Eygen
  • Maxime Daive
  • Philippe Baise

Excused

  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Bart Reekmans
  • Ben Goosse
  • Jean-Francois Coquelet
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Katleen Smedts
  • Laurent Lamouline
  • Lionel Cremer
  • Pieter Devolder
  • Richard Francken

Agenda

  • resolution of issues

Meeting Minutes

  • We have to change the meeting schedule once more due to one stakeholder not able to join on Thursdays at 3PM, apologies, we agree to schedule the meetings on a weekly basis on Fridays at 9AM
  • The technical meeting to prepare some issues hasn't taken place yet, will happen in the upcoming days and they will provide updates in the next WG meeting
  • we need a regular overview - how do we do this ? we will add a mapping table to the IG, every field from the logical model will be mapped to a FHIR resource
  • the profiles don't seem specific anymore, we decide to close the issue, we can always recreate one if it still occurs
  • we use it to differentiate the type of referral (medical imaging, nursing, ...)
  • are we still going to use this or are we only going to rely on the value in the code (template in orderDetail) ? category is not mandatory at FHIR int'l level
  • await feedback from technical meeting
  • it is used in eAgreement physio (snomed CT code for physiotherapy)
  • when a prescription is based on another prescription
  • feedback from Anne necessary
  • "replaces" will be used for prolongation, see related comment in the standard
  • basedOn will be used in case of a proposal , reference to a careplan or any other prior resource that causes this request
  • we still need to discuss on how to deal with duplicates
  • can be closed, linked to issue 47
  • swagger will not be used
  • backend would prefer to have it in the form of FHIR resources
  • the use of an operation for the start is still under consideration
  • need feedback from Hans
  • similar to issue 52
  • backend would prefer to have it in the form of FHIR resources
  • the use of an operation for the end is still under consideration
  • need feedback from Hans

Agenda next meeting

  • feedback from technical meeting
  • continuation of resolution of issues

Next meeting: next week Friday 27 Jan at 9AM