Minutes - Referral WG 2023-02-10

Attendees

• Anne Nerenhausen
• Anthony Maton
• Bart Decuypere
• Bart Reekmans
• Ben Goosse
• Hans De Keersmaeker
• Jacques Yakoub
• Jean-Michel Polfliet
• Julien Beard
• Katrien Dickx
• Karlien Erauw
• Maarten Cobbaert (partially)
• Marleen Van Eygen
• Maxime Daive
• Philippe Baise
• Robin Merckx

Excused

• Benjamien Schmitt
• Christophe Behaegel
• Cyprien Janssens
• Dorsan de Fabricheckers
• Geert Vandenhole

• Jean-Francois Coquelet
• José Costa Teixeira
• Katleen Smedts
• Laurent Lamouline
• Lionel Cremer
• Pablo Christiaens
• Pieter Devolder
• Richard Francken

Agenda

• Resolution of issues

Meeting Minutes

• Does the group agree with the proposal presented last week

• the group agrees that this proposal is moved to the master branch
• so issue 91 can be closed
• any comments can still be raised in the upcoming weeks

• One new issue #201

• will the controls by mutuatity or RIZIV be done directly on the UHMEP platform : this is outside the UHMEP platform
• the only thing that changes is the prescription ID

• Work on use case :

• work on one use case (medication line) has been done and is present in the IG (implementation guide)
• recently the use case on the blood case has been added, is also present in the IG
• annex 81 will be the next use case that will be tackled

• referral task & performer taksk: standard FHIR quering sytem will be used

• this closes issue #199
• Issue 197: there will be additional Snomed CT codes so therefore this issue can not yet be closed
• Issue 194: work is ongoing on use cases
• Issue 193: there will be an additional serviceRequest that will refer to another medication line, so issue can be closed
• Issue 191: awaiting extra input, remains open, no input ready yet
• Issue 190: is resolved through the proposed architecture
• Issue 177: timing datatype, is still being looked into

• is start time & duration sufficient : RIZIV confirms that this is fine, there is often only a start date without time, so start time is optional

• Issue 187: legislation requests that the medication is mentioned again on the prescription (for patient security reasons), therefore the issue remains open. There are 3 possible options that need to be presented to the business first
• Issue 176: if there is no litoral reference, there is a strong recommendation to have a logical reference (advice from HL7 BE FHIR WG infrastructure & architecture)

• UHMEP will only use logical references (for Patient, Practioner)

• Issue 186: UCUM units for medication administration

• nu update yet
• this has to be taken up by the WG FHIR Medication

• Issue 169: a document has been provided

• a follow-up meeting will happen as from next week

• Issue 168: input from José needed
• Issue 167: remains open
• Issue 149: route value set, a subset valueset will be sent by RIZIV
• Issue 147: use of Task is resolved by the architecture proposal
• Issue 130: mandatory UUID ?

• UHMEP will provide the UUID and the client will receive the UUID when looking up the prescription (through location header)
• it is up to the client whether they have accidentally created a double prescription (if the call is made twice)

• Issue 126: a use case will be created
• Issue 77: this is part of the valueset
• Issue 73: this is part of the document that will be released later on today (COBHRA sources - if incomplete RIZIV will check and o the necessary)
• Issue 70: input will be received later on today
• Issue 54: there is a document on operations

• the information will have to be added to the IG, including an API description (using the FHIR standard operations + some specific operations)
• in which form do the vendors like to have the API description (in IG or in a cookbook) ? feedback by next week
• see: https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/referral/branches/issue-91/OperationDefinition-be-op-cancel

Agenda next meeting

• presentation of valueset by RIZIV (Anne)
• continuation of resolution of issues
• input vendors on issue 54

Next meeting: next week Friday 17 Feb at 9AM