Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Security WG 2023-03-22"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
===== Minutes =====
 
===== Minutes =====
 
* Introduction of newcomer Filip Veldeman and the group
 
* Introduction of newcomer Filip Veldeman and the group
::* filip works toward semantic interoperability and on implementing a single  
+
::* Filip works toward semantic interoperability and on implementing a single structured problem list within a hospital (using NLP to migrate to Snomed CT)
::* Filip aims to implement
+
::* caresets & FHIR come into play here, therefore Filip joins this WG
 +
 
 
* CoZo: FHIR resource received from pharma softs
 
* CoZo: FHIR resource received from pharma softs
 
::* should URL be put in the resource
 
::* should URL be put in the resource
Line 53: Line 54:
 
::* what if the request is being cancelled  
 
::* what if the request is being cancelled  
 
::* FHIR allows multiple identifiers per resource, some can be temporary, a period of validity can be added  
 
::* FHIR allows multiple identifiers per resource, some can be temporary, a period of validity can be added  
::* can the prescribing system use an identifier  
+
::* can the prescribing system use an identifier ?
 
+
::* Anthony will write up a proposal  
 
 
'''Use cases for Permission and Consent and respective need for interoperability and computability: [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sX3-K1EIvLo6cr2GGp_aS8s9k9lmXzUeT-6cjY0Htp0/edit see document here]
 
::* Steven has added 2 scenarios #6 and #7
 
::::* should notes be an element or a resource to tag the resource or the element
 
::::* is it an option so make slices in a care plan to put the HCP's notes or the patient's notes
 
::::* using an hierarchy for care plans that consists of several elements is an option
 
 
 
::* '''See: https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/fhir-security-label-ds4p/
 
::::* we are looking at Inline Security Labels
 
 
 
::* is there a difference a private and a public annotation ? do we want to go towards attribute filtering access
 
 
 
* proposal of next step: list up approaches and look at variants
 
  
* how to tag the attributes
+
* Please continue to provide your feedback to '''Use cases for Permission and Consent and respective need for interoperability and computability: [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sX3-K1EIvLo6cr2GGp_aS8s9k9lmXzUeT-6cjY0Htp0/edit see document here]
* GDPR: purpose of use in a hospital ?
 
::* it is handled at legal level, they cannot share this by law
 
  
 
* Please note that the next meeting is on Tuesday 17 April at 10AM (due to easter holidays)
 
* Please note that the next meeting is on Tuesday 17 April at 10AM (due to easter holidays)

Latest revision as of 09:43, 22 March 2023

Attendees
  • Anthony Maton
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Brian Thieren
  • Dominiek Leclerq
  • Elien De Koker
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Filip Veldeman, BMIA
  • Jan Stinissen
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Nick Hermans
  • Philippe Baise
  • Steven Van den Berghe
  • Werner De Mulder
Excused/Not present
  • Cyprien Janssens
  • Didier Temans
  • Erwin Bellon
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Jan Lenie
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Marco Busschots
  • Nick Hermans
Agenda
  • issue with incoming FHIR resource
  • data capabilities hospital projects
  • UUID
Minutes
  • Introduction of newcomer Filip Veldeman and the group
  • Filip works toward semantic interoperability and on implementing a single structured problem list within a hospital (using NLP to migrate to Snomed CT)
  • caresets & FHIR come into play here, therefore Filip joins this WG
  • CoZo: FHIR resource received from pharma softs
  • should URL be put in the resource
  • it is technically possible but not the best way to go
  • what type of coding is best to use the vendor number
  • Data capabilities projects call from FOD VG/SPF - deadline 17 April
  • projects on hospitals network level that look into structured data
  • linked to federated structured problem list within one hospital & sumehr so caresets & FHIR
  • there are different levels: hospital, hospital networks, hub/metahub level
  • there is ambition to do it on the top level in the right way ; what is the best way ? which people are needed to include ?
  • there is the need to be interoperable with the European level
  • maturity of FHIR resources is still quite low at European level, the data modelling part is mature though
  • identifier management
  • linked to referral project that will produce millions of prescriptions yearly
  • what if the request is being cancelled
  • FHIR allows multiple identifiers per resource, some can be temporary, a period of validity can be added
  • can the prescribing system use an identifier ?
  • Anthony will write up a proposal
  • Please continue to provide your feedback to Use cases for Permission and Consent and respective need for interoperability and computability: see document here
  • Please note that the next meeting is on Tuesday 17 April at 10AM (due to easter holidays)
Action items
  • Security controls: continue work on use cases for permission and consent
  • Position of HL7 Belgium on the FHIR R5 release (to cover the already upcoming questions from players and stakeholders in Belgium)
  • FHIR readiness of Belgian metahub-hub system: see preparation work
Next meeting
  • Tuesday 18 April at 10AM