Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Medication WG 2024-10-01"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Anne Nerenhausen | * Anne Nerenhausen | ||
* Bart Decuypere | * Bart Decuypere | ||
| − | * Ilse | + | * Ilse Dossche (Healthdata, Sciensano) |
* Jan Lenie | * Jan Lenie | ||
* Jens Penny | * Jens Penny | ||
Revision as of 09:28, 1 October 2024
Attendees
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Annemieke Vergauwe
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Bart Decuypere
- Ilse Dossche (Healthdata, Sciensano)
- Jan Lenie
- Jens Penny
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Loic Carlier
- Marc Buckens
- Nils D'hont
- Pablo Christiaens
- Philippe Baise
- Ruben Walraevens
- Tom Henkens
- Walter Bollaert
- Will van Norel
Excused/Not present
- Annabel Dompas
- Bart Rondou
- Benoit Van Houtte
- Dieter Sauvillers
- Félix De Tavernier
- Hanne Vuegen
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Jacques Yakoub
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Katrien Thorré
- Lodewijk Sioen
- Nathan Peeters
- Nils Devos
- Marcelo Romero-Cors
- Nick Hermans
- Stephane Bouillon
- Thomas Van Langendonck
- Tom De Backer
- Werner De Mulder
Agenda
- Medication prescription in FHIR
Minutes
- José updates the WG on the grouping of prescription request following discussions at international level
- The business document has been shared with us by INAMI/RIZIV, see here
- The logical model is here
- we need to ensure the logical model is aligned with the business requirements
- this document includes the results from the last discussions
- for RIZIV there is 1-1 identifier, in other systems it can be 1 to many
- this work is necessary before moving to publication
- We create a new issue 217 as there will not always be a medication line, at least not in the beginning
- There have been alignments with the VIDIS medication scheme project as well as with the caresets projects, both managed by RIZIV/INAMI
- There was a meeting with the business experts last week. The last version of the Business rules are being finalised and will be shared with the WG next week.
- will visi flag be part of the logical model or not ; it will be part of the access matrix ; for the moment we will not add it to the logical model
- proposal to take visi flag out of all the caresets ; RIZIV to come up with a general proposal for the visi flag, see issue 194
- We are looking into the issues and the pull requests
- issue 204: we don't need the pull request
- issue 202: pull request will be removed
- issue 206: pull request will be removed
* Action items:
- review logical model in alignment with the business document
Next meeting: 15 October at 11AM
