Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Medication WG 2020-07-07"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* remarks on updates on profiling | * remarks on updates on profiling | ||
'''Meeting Minutes''' | '''Meeting Minutes''' | ||
− | * | + | * most recent updates on profiling (changes in medication deispense) are currently not available online as build is being done locally, should be available tomorrow |
+ | * question: actors - display is not part of identifier: has been clarified | ||
* NIHDI identifier issue | * NIHDI identifier issue | ||
− | + | ::* NIHDI presents a caregiver/professional or an organization/pharmacy, within professional/organization it is unique – what we need to do is adding 2 naming systems | |
+ | ::::* NIHDI for professional | ||
+ | ::::* NIHDI for organisation | ||
+ | ::* Profile on medication dispense has 2 slices – performer-dispensingPerson and performer-dispensingOrganization | ||
+ | ::::* at least one has to be there - this will be enforced (important also for traceability) | ||
+ | ::::* Issue f.e. for bandagists as they don't have a NIHDI. Idea is that one performer is mandatory but a local identifier could be used | ||
+ | ::* Type of dispenser (f.e. intramuros pharmacy, extramuros pharmacy, physiotherapist, nurse, GP, doctor-specialist, ...) | ||
+ | ::::* NIHDI professional will not specify the type of the professional (nurse, GP, specialists, …) | ||
+ | ::::* Type of organization is vital information in Belgium f.e. regarding checking authorizations of dispenses | ||
+ | ::::* Can this be looked up within our FHIR profiling if the lookup exists ;Look up can have an impact, do we want the dispense to fail ? | ||
+ | ::::* Complexity should be solved at the origin, not at the client side | ||
+ | ::::* Can we kick out GFD-pharmacy and use the eHealth numbering (metadata from eHealth) | ||
+ | ::::* BePractioner should be common in Belgium | ||
+ | ::::* BeMedicationDispense: will also be used by vending machine, hospitals, vaccination organization, pharmacy,… | ||
+ | ::* NIDHI of practioners can “evolve”: last 3 digits have speciliazation so the last 3 digits can change if his specialization changes – how we are going to tackle the evolution of NIHDI ? | ||
+ | ::::* Dispense : only uses the id that is currently valid | ||
+ | ::::* Catalog: same practioner will have several identifiers and the evolution of id in time, even indicating the validity period of the identifier | ||
+ | ::::* Within HL7 Belgium we have to show the progress we make – notion of history of NIHDI – so that issues are solved in the future in the same way | ||
+ | ::* Goal is to publish the profile and include an example | ||
+ | ::* --> this will be added in the profiling. José will send out an email on the 2 ways of how this can be done | ||
'''Next meeting: Aug 4 - July 21 meeting is cancelled due to public holiday''' | '''Next meeting: Aug 4 - July 21 meeting is cancelled due to public holiday''' | ||
Karlien to send out cancellation and insist on revision of profiling by everyone & providing feedback | Karlien to send out cancellation and insist on revision of profiling by everyone & providing feedback |
Revision as of 13:31, 7 July 2020
Attendees
- Tom Henkens
- José Costa Teixeira
- Elhassan Baazizi
- Marc Buckens
- Jens Penny
- Karlien Erauw
Excused
- Robin Bosman
Agenda
- medication dispense: move stage further
- NIHDI uniqueness issue
- remarks on updates on profiling
Meeting Minutes
- most recent updates on profiling (changes in medication deispense) are currently not available online as build is being done locally, should be available tomorrow
- question: actors - display is not part of identifier: has been clarified
- NIHDI identifier issue
- NIHDI presents a caregiver/professional or an organization/pharmacy, within professional/organization it is unique – what we need to do is adding 2 naming systems
- NIHDI for professional
- NIHDI for organisation
- Profile on medication dispense has 2 slices – performer-dispensingPerson and performer-dispensingOrganization
- at least one has to be there - this will be enforced (important also for traceability)
- Issue f.e. for bandagists as they don't have a NIHDI. Idea is that one performer is mandatory but a local identifier could be used
- Type of dispenser (f.e. intramuros pharmacy, extramuros pharmacy, physiotherapist, nurse, GP, doctor-specialist, ...)
- NIHDI professional will not specify the type of the professional (nurse, GP, specialists, …)
- Type of organization is vital information in Belgium f.e. regarding checking authorizations of dispenses
- Can this be looked up within our FHIR profiling if the lookup exists ;Look up can have an impact, do we want the dispense to fail ?
- Complexity should be solved at the origin, not at the client side
- Can we kick out GFD-pharmacy and use the eHealth numbering (metadata from eHealth)
- BePractioner should be common in Belgium
- BeMedicationDispense: will also be used by vending machine, hospitals, vaccination organization, pharmacy,…
- NIDHI of practioners can “evolve”: last 3 digits have speciliazation so the last 3 digits can change if his specialization changes – how we are going to tackle the evolution of NIHDI ?
- Dispense : only uses the id that is currently valid
- Catalog: same practioner will have several identifiers and the evolution of id in time, even indicating the validity period of the identifier
- Within HL7 Belgium we have to show the progress we make – notion of history of NIHDI – so that issues are solved in the future in the same way
- Goal is to publish the profile and include an example
- --> this will be added in the profiling. José will send out an email on the 2 ways of how this can be done
Next meeting: Aug 4 - July 21 meeting is cancelled due to public holiday Karlien to send out cancellation and insist on revision of profiling by everyone & providing feedback