Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2020-04-16"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
(Created page with "HL7 Belgium WG Referral 2020 04 02, 5PM <br> 8 participants <br> skype call Meeting 2 Meeting Minutes – by Karlien Erauw & Robin Bosman Attendees: * TBD Agenda: * Roll ca...")
 
 
(39 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
HL7 Belgium WG Referral 2020 04 02, 5PM
+
=== HL7 Belgium WG Procedure Referral 2020 04 16, 1PM - Meeting Minutes ===
 +
<br>9 participants
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
8 participants
+
Microsoft Teams call
 +
<br><br>
 +
''Meeting Minutes – by Karlien Erauw & Robin Bosman''
 +
<br><br>
 +
'''Attendees:'''
 +
* Robin Bosman
 +
* Nick Hermans
 +
* Philippe Baise
 +
* Philip Sidgwick
 +
* Richard Francken
 +
* Will Van Norel
 +
* Arnaud Lippert
 +
* Karlien Erauw
 +
* Erwin Bellon (late arrival)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Agenda:'''
 +
* Roll call
 +
* Review of WG Mission Statement document
 +
* Presentation of "Verwijsvoorschrift Scenarios V2 RIZIV"
 +
* First inputs on logical model of NIHDI
 +
**Identification of FHIR resources to work on?
 +
<br>
 +
'''Meeting Minutes:'''
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
skype call
+
* Opening remark from Arnaud: a data analyst from RIZIV will have a look at the information model in the upcoming weeks<br>
 +
* WG Mission statement : see draft on wiki pages, presented by Robin
 +
** The group discusses the importance of the existence of use cases. As these provide the context for our datamodel we should have this context. RIZIV already has already put a note together on the different scenarios that can fulfill this - the group can give feedback on this (cfr. infra for links)
 +
** Remark on codesystems: are these completely out of scope ? The group strongly feels advice, clarifications and/or direction will indeed be necessary in some cases
 +
*** Robin will finetune the out-of-scope paragraph, the WG feels the scope is above all on message structure, not on transport layer or the general interoperability architecture.
 +
 
 +
* Presentation of "Verwijsvoorschrift Scenarios V2 RIZIV", by Arnaud
 +
** Was already validated by all organisations of the care providers/beroepsbeoefenaars
 +
** Part 1 is about: what is a referral, what are the needs, ...
 +
** More explanations about p11, Scenario 1
  
−
Meeting 2
+
* Introduction of draft of "logical model of NIHDI" by Robin
  
−
Meeting Minutes – by Karlien Erauw & Robin Bosman
 
  
−
Attendees:
+
'''Action points for all: review of and provide feedback/comments/questions on'''
−
* TBD
+
* [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1z-pBDYDW0dxG9Qb4b79DHE61PxtnMTss Mission Statement]
−
Agenda:
+
* [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xYrH2fybKQjdCnPG24QFpF00LSBVDKn8 Information Model]
−
* Roll call
+
* [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1q__dKYGW5A2uRPLMBl9g-Mne0vW2de5D WG Use Cases]
−
* Review of mission Statement
+
* [https://drive.google.com/open?id=132LWjsJ37WiKQ5b33gw86BQ759L2Le16 Verwijsvoorschrift Scenarios V2 NL RIZIV]
−
* First inputs on logical model of NIHDI
+
 
−
* Next meeting schedule
+
<br>
 +
'''Next meeting : April 30 at 1PM (every other Thursday at 1PM) - recurring meeting invites have been sent out '''

Latest revision as of 06:41, 23 April 2020

HL7 Belgium WG Procedure Referral 2020 04 16, 1PM - Meeting Minutes


9 participants
Microsoft Teams call

Meeting Minutes – by Karlien Erauw & Robin Bosman

Attendees:

  • Robin Bosman
  • Nick Hermans
  • Philippe Baise
  • Philip Sidgwick
  • Richard Francken
  • Will Van Norel
  • Arnaud Lippert
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Erwin Bellon (late arrival)


Agenda:

  • Roll call
  • Review of WG Mission Statement document
  • Presentation of "Verwijsvoorschrift Scenarios V2 RIZIV"
  • First inputs on logical model of NIHDI
    • Identification of FHIR resources to work on?


Meeting Minutes:

  • Opening remark from Arnaud: a data analyst from RIZIV will have a look at the information model in the upcoming weeks
  • WG Mission statement : see draft on wiki pages, presented by Robin
    • The group discusses the importance of the existence of use cases. As these provide the context for our datamodel we should have this context. RIZIV already has already put a note together on the different scenarios that can fulfill this - the group can give feedback on this (cfr. infra for links)
    • Remark on codesystems: are these completely out of scope ? The group strongly feels advice, clarifications and/or direction will indeed be necessary in some cases
      • Robin will finetune the out-of-scope paragraph, the WG feels the scope is above all on message structure, not on transport layer or the general interoperability architecture.
  • Presentation of "Verwijsvoorschrift Scenarios V2 RIZIV", by Arnaud
    • Was already validated by all organisations of the care providers/beroepsbeoefenaars
    • Part 1 is about: what is a referral, what are the needs, ...
    • More explanations about p11, Scenario 1
  • Introduction of draft of "logical model of NIHDI" by Robin


Action points for all: review of and provide feedback/comments/questions on


Next meeting : April 30 at 1PM (every other Thursday at 1PM) - recurring meeting invites have been sent out

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7belgium.org/index.php?title=Minutes_-_Referral_WG_2020-04-16&oldid=300"