Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2022-10-25"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
* Issue 165: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/165 | * Issue 165: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/165 | ||
::* quick win for the visualizer: when opening the Service request when showing the file | ::* quick win for the visualizer: when opening the Service request when showing the file | ||
− | ::* please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and as such | + | ::* please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and its rework as such is not eligible for this kind of meeting |
* Issue 164: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/164 | * Issue 164: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/164 | ||
::* add postal codes to visualiser | ::* add postal codes to visualiser | ||
− | ::* please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and as such | + | ::* please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and its rework as such is not eligible for this kind of meeting |
* Issue 163: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/163 | * Issue 163: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/163 | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
* Issue 160: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/160 - is more a question | * Issue 160: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/160 - is more a question | ||
::* our profile is for a diagnostic report - do we need to mention this in the guidance | ::* our profile is for a diagnostic report - do we need to mention this in the guidance | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Issue 157: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/157 - have logical model | ||
+ | ::* eHealth platform will reverse engineer technical model to have a logical model and have it reviewed by the clinical biologists - any volunteers are welcomed | ||
+ | ::* NL has already a logical model | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Issue 144: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/144, raised by Philippe Cauchie on dynamic testing: more info (fro mMIPS) is needed | ||
+ | * Issue 141: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/141, clarification from MIPS is needed | ||
+ | * Issue 139: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/139, label from LOINC codes differ from those in RETAM | ||
+ | ::* loinc numbers will be there, often being RETAM ; a description of the test will be a label that will depend on the lab performing the test, that description will not be the label | ||
+ | ::* if the LOINC code is a RETAM code then the RETAM description will have to be used | ||
+ | ::* results will be displayed next to one another, showing the RETAM label - which can be confusing | ||
+ | ::* RETAM descriptions can be long though although there are short labels | ||
+ | ::* --> the labs have to ensure to use the same label on the paper record and digital report | ||
+ | ::* --> it is up to the GP softs to decide what they show when results come form different labs | ||
+ | ::* this info will have to be included in the guidance | ||
* Open issues | * Open issues | ||
− | ::* | + | ::* work on logical model |
::* is the visualizer part of the standard ? if so, documentation will be necessary | ::* is the visualizer part of the standard ? if so, documentation will be necessary | ||
Line 81: | Line 96: | ||
* wrap-up and resolution of any open issues if they arise | * wrap-up and resolution of any open issues if they arise | ||
− | '''Next Meeting : TBC | + | '''Next Meeting : TBC - in the upcoming weeks ''' |
Latest revision as of 17:42, 25 October 2022
Attendees
- Dr Alain Derom
- Ardon Toonstra
- Bart Decuypere
- Benny Verhamme
- Christoff Nicque
- Frédéric Istace
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Ilse
- Jean-Michel Polfiet
- Jonathan Capitano
- Jos Bellen
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Kristof Jaubin
- Peter Laridon
- Robert Nicolas
- Theo Schumacher
- Thibault Mahieu
- Thomas Mellen
- Tom Fiers
- Tom Tollenaere
Excused/Not present
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Bart Havermans
- Filip Migom
- Frederik De Kegel
- Frederik Lenaerts -
- Hendrik De Moor
- Joost Van Averbeke
- Lotte Adriaensen
- Mieke Buckinx
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Pablo Christiaens
- Philippe Cauchie
- Olivier Lothaire
- Paul Neyens
- Richard Francken
- Roland Vueghs
- Stefan Waegemans
- Toon Schiemsky
- Veerle Claessens
- Werner De Mulder
Agenda
- Issue resolutions
- New issues/questions from an open Q&A organised by the eHealth platform earlier this afternoon
- other project request: analyse m.b.t. de ontiwkkeling van een nieuwe nationale database en applicatie m.b.t. antistoffen tegen rode bloedcellen en bloedplaatjes
Minutes
Context: since the publication of the profile mid September by eHealth platform, some new issues have been raised
Resolution of open issues: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues
- Issue 165: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/165
- quick win for the visualizer: when opening the Service request when showing the file
- please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and its rework as such is not eligible for this kind of meeting
- Issue 164: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/164
- add postal codes to visualiser
- please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and its rework as such is not eligible for this kind of meeting
- Issue 163: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/163
- a lab can have different activity centers but only 1 RIZIV number
- has to be dealt with as part of BeOrganisation as part of the core profile
- Issue 162: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/162 - is more a question
- lab results related to blood transfusion
- having a centralized database would be risky
- tests regarding blood transfusions can be dealt with in this profile
- Issue 160: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/160 - is more a question
- our profile is for a diagnostic report - do we need to mention this in the guidance
- Issue 157: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/157 - have logical model
- eHealth platform will reverse engineer technical model to have a logical model and have it reviewed by the clinical biologists - any volunteers are welcomed
- NL has already a logical model
- Issue 144: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/144, raised by Philippe Cauchie on dynamic testing: more info (fro mMIPS) is needed
- Issue 141: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/141, clarification from MIPS is needed
- Issue 139: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/139, label from LOINC codes differ from those in RETAM
- loinc numbers will be there, often being RETAM ; a description of the test will be a label that will depend on the lab performing the test, that description will not be the label
- if the LOINC code is a RETAM code then the RETAM description will have to be used
- results will be displayed next to one another, showing the RETAM label - which can be confusing
- RETAM descriptions can be long though although there are short labels
- --> the labs have to ensure to use the same label on the paper record and digital report
- --> it is up to the GP softs to decide what they show when results come form different labs
- this info will have to be included in the guidance
- Open issues
- work on logical model
- is the visualizer part of the standard ? if so, documentation will be necessary
Agenda for next meeting:
- wrap-up and resolution of any open issues if they arise
Next Meeting : TBC - in the upcoming weeks