|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | ==== Attendees ==== | | ==== Attendees ==== |
| | * Dr Alain Derom | | * Dr Alain Derom |
| − | * Ardon Toonstra
| |
| | * Bart Decuypere | | * Bart Decuypere |
| − | * Benny Verhamme | + | * Dr Philippe Cauchie |
| − | * Christoff Nicque
| + | * Jean-Michel Polfliet |
| − | * Frédéric Istace
| |
| − | * Hans De Keersmaecker
| |
| − | * Ilse
| |
| − | * Jean-Michel Polfiet | |
| − | * Jonathan Capitano
| |
| − | * Jos Bellen
| |
| | * José Costa Teixeira | | * José Costa Teixeira |
| | * Karlien Erauw | | * Karlien Erauw |
| − | * Kristof Jaubin
| |
| − | * Peter Laridon
| |
| − | * Robert Nicolas
| |
| − | * Theo Schumacher
| |
| − | * Thibault Mahieu
| |
| − | * Thomas Mellen
| |
| − | * Tom Fiers
| |
| − | * Tom Tollenaere
| |
| | | | |
| | ==== Excused/Not present ==== | | ==== Excused/Not present ==== |
| − | * Alexis Van Zeveren | + | * Tom Fiers |
| − | * Bart Havermans
| |
| − | * Filip Migom
| |
| − | * Frederik De Kegel
| |
| − | * Frederik Lenaerts -
| |
| − | * Hendrik De Moor
| |
| − | * Joost Van Averbeke
| |
| − | * Lotte Adriaensen
| |
| − | * Mieke Buckinx
| |
| − | * Nick Hermans
| |
| − | * Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
| |
| − | * Pablo Christiaens
| |
| − | * Philippe Cauchie
| |
| − | * Olivier Lothaire
| |
| − | * Paul Neyens
| |
| − | * Richard Francken
| |
| − | * Roland Vueghs
| |
| − | * Stefan Waegemans
| |
| − | * Toon Schiemsky
| |
| − | * Veerle Claessens
| |
| − | * Werner De Mulder
| |
| | | | |
| | ==== Agenda ==== | | ==== Agenda ==== |
| − | * Issue resolutions | + | * Work on missing logical model lab result |
| − | * New issues/questions from an open Q&A organised by the eHealth platform earlier this afternoon
| |
| − | * other project request: analyse m.b.t. de ontiwkkeling van een nieuwe nationale database en applicatie m.b.t. antistoffen tegen rode bloedcellen en bloedplaatjes
| |
| | | | |
| | ==== Minutes ==== | | ==== Minutes ==== |
| − | Context: since the publication of the profile mid September by eHealth platform, some [https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues new issues] have been raised | + | Context: the profile mid September by eHealth platform has been published but we have realised that the logical model is missing |
| − | | |
| − | Resolution of open issues: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues
| |
| − | * Issue 165: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/165
| |
| − | ::* quick win for the visualizer: when opening the Service request when showing the file
| |
| − | ::* please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and its rework as such is not eligible for this kind of meeting
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Issue 164: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/164
| |
| − | ::* add postal codes to visualiser
| |
| − | ::* please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and its rework as such is not eligible for this kind of meeting
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Issue 163: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/163
| |
| − | ::* a lab can have different activity centers but only 1 RIZIV number
| |
| − | ::* has to be dealt with as part of BeOrganisation as part of the core profile
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Issue 162: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/162 - is more a question
| |
| − | ::* lab results related to blood transfusion
| |
| − | ::* having a centralized database would be risky
| |
| − | ::* tests regarding blood transfusions can be dealt with in this profile
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Issue 160: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/160 - is more a question
| |
| − | ::* our profile is for a diagnostic report - do we need to mention this in the guidance
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Issue 157: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/157 - have logical model
| |
| − | ::* eHealth platform will reverse engineer technical model to have a logical model and have it reviewed by the clinical biologists - any volunteers are welcomed
| |
| − | ::* NL has already a logical model
| |
| | | | |
| − | * Issue 144: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/144, raised by Philippe Cauchie on dynamic testing: more info (fro mMIPS) is needed
| + | Need to reverse engineer the current technical model and have it reviewed by people with more knowledge of clinical biology. That'w hy some people were invited in this meeting. |
| − | * Issue 141: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/141, clarification from MIPS is needed
| |
| − | * Issue 139: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues/139, label from LOINC codes differ from those in RETAM
| |
| − | ::* loinc numbers will be there, often being RETAM ; a description of the test will be a label that will depend on the lab performing the test, that description will not be the label
| |
| − | ::* if the LOINC code is a RETAM code then the RETAM description will have to be used
| |
| − | ::* results will be displayed next to one another, showing the RETAM label - which can be confusing
| |
| − | ::* RETAM descriptions can be long though although there are short labels
| |
| − | ::* --> the labs have to ensure to use the same label on the paper record and digital report
| |
| − | ::* --> it is up to the GP softs to decide what they show when results come form different labs
| |
| − | ::* this info will have to be included in the guidance
| |
| | | | |
| − | * Open issues
| |
| − | ::* work on logical model
| |
| − | ::* is the visualizer part of the standard ? if so, documentation will be necessary
| |
| | | | |
| | '''Agenda for next meeting''': | | '''Agenda for next meeting''': |
