Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2023-04-14"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=== Attendees === * Anne Nerenhausen * Anthony Maton * Bart Decuypere * Bart Reekmans * Ben Goosse * Dorsan de Fabricheckers * Emily Sevrin * Geert Vandenhole * Hans De Keer...") |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Attendees === | === Attendees === | ||
* Anne Nerenhausen | * Anne Nerenhausen | ||
− | |||
* Bart Decuypere | * Bart Decuypere | ||
* Bart Reekmans | * Bart Reekmans | ||
− | |||
* Dorsan de Fabricheckers | * Dorsan de Fabricheckers | ||
* Emily Sevrin | * Emily Sevrin | ||
* Geert Vandenhole | * Geert Vandenhole | ||
− | |||
* Jean-Michel Polfliet | * Jean-Michel Polfliet | ||
* Julien Beard | * Julien Beard | ||
* Karlien Erauw | * Karlien Erauw | ||
− | * Katrien | + | * Katrien Thorré |
* Lionel Cremer | * Lionel Cremer | ||
* Maarten Cobbaert | * Maarten Cobbaert | ||
− | |||
* Maxime Daive | * Maxime Daive | ||
+ | * Nathan Peeters (INAMI) | ||
+ | * Pablo Christiaens | ||
* Philippe Baise | * Philippe Baise | ||
* Philippe Lejoly | * Philippe Lejoly | ||
=== Excused === | === Excused === | ||
− | * | + | * Anthony Maton |
+ | * Ben Goosse | ||
* Christophe Behaegel | * Christophe Behaegel | ||
* Cyprien Janssens | * Cyprien Janssens | ||
+ | * Hans De Keersmaecker | ||
* Jacques Yakoub | * Jacques Yakoub | ||
* Jean-Francois Coquelet | * Jean-Francois Coquelet | ||
* José Costa Teixeira | * José Costa Teixeira | ||
* Katleen Smedts | * Katleen Smedts | ||
+ | * Katrien Dickx | ||
+ | * Marleen Van Eygen - | ||
* Laurent Lamouline | * Laurent Lamouline | ||
− | |||
* Pieter Devolder | * Pieter Devolder | ||
* Richard Francken | * Richard Francken | ||
Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
=== Meeting Minutes === | === Meeting Minutes === | ||
− | * | + | * Nathan presents himself as part of the INAMI team of Anne Nerenhausen working on the caresets |
− | * | + | * Update of business rules V0.21, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/219 see in issue 219] |
− | * | + | ::* change for eAgreement to include links |
− | + | ::::* eAgreement: ReferenceID and ReceptionDate (when performer receives the response from advisory doctor) | |
− | ::* | + | ::::* in serviceRequest a link to the claimResponse can be put (an update of the business rules is needed) |
− | * [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/ | + | ::* medication lines that have an impact on the nursing templates (medication, posology and dosage) |
− | ::* | + | ::::* structured solution, not textual one, in the same way as in VIDIS - it is a temporary solution though as VIDIS has not been finalised yet |
− | + | ::* separate new issues will be created to ensure follow up actions on each of these changes | |
− | * [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/216 | + | |
− | ::* | + | ::* new field in logical model device on woundcare : action + type of material (attribute device) |
− | ::* | + | ::::* there will be 3 serviceRequests having a RequestGroup that groups the 3 of them |
− | ::* can | + | ::::::* or one ServiceRequest with some orderDetails ? TBC |
− | + | ::::* it will be clarified in the upcoming weeks as a meeting on this topic will happen next week | |
− | * [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/ | + | |
− | ::* | + | ::* new field in business rules Amamnesis |
− | ::* | + | ::* prescription support information: are still present in the business rules/logical model |
− | + | ::::* ID and reason (reason of deviation on recommendation) | |
− | * [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/ | + | |
− | ::* | + | * New issues in [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/ Issue list] |
− | + | * Is orderDetail precise enough, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/218 see here] | |
− | * [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/ | + | ::* some more meetings will happen to discuss each template |
− | ::* | + | |
− | * [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/ | + | * Change on Requester field, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/217 see here] |
− | ::* | + | ::* modify to a BePractionerRole : agreed upon |
− | * [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/ | + | |
− | ::* | + | * Add name/version of client software, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/216 see here] |
− | + | ::* looked at eHealth specification | |
− | + | ::* name and version will not be added in metadata as it is already present | |
− | ::* | + | ::* issue can be closed as no action is needed |
− | + | ||
− | + | * Unmapped fields, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/215 see here] | |
− | + | ::* link to issue 218 | |
− | + | ::* this can be solved in the same way as issue 218 | |
− | + | ||
+ | * Namespace for identifier, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/214 see here] | ||
+ | ::* INAMI security team has been consulted and is not confident on the proposed solution, ticket will be updated | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Body locations inconsistencies, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/213 see here] | ||
+ | ::* inconsistencies will be resolved next week, they will be available in a new version of the business rules by next week | ||
+ | |||
+ | * CoSign, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/211 see here] | ||
+ | ::* have the result been looked at ? industry still have to come back on this | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Route and device, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/205 see here] | ||
+ | ::* info is in the new business rules | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Versioning and evolution of profiles, [https://github.com/hl7-be/referral/issues/191 see here] | ||
+ | ::* to be discussed and decided upon in FHIR Validation & Infrastructure WG | ||
+ | |||
+ | * close issue 169 | ||
+ | * Modifications resulting from business rules will be applied in the logical model and profile | ||
=== Agenda next meeting === | === Agenda next meeting === | ||
− | * | + | * review update of logical model following the update of the business rules |
* continue resolution of issues | * continue resolution of issues | ||
'''Next meeting: next week Friday 21 April at 9AM ''' | '''Next meeting: next week Friday 21 April at 9AM ''' |
Latest revision as of 09:03, 14 April 2023
Attendees
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Bart Decuypere
- Bart Reekmans
- Dorsan de Fabricheckers
- Emily Sevrin
- Geert Vandenhole
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Julien Beard
- Karlien Erauw
- Katrien Thorré
- Lionel Cremer
- Maarten Cobbaert
- Maxime Daive
- Nathan Peeters (INAMI)
- Pablo Christiaens
- Philippe Baise
- Philippe Lejoly
Excused
- Anthony Maton
- Ben Goosse
- Christophe Behaegel
- Cyprien Janssens
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Jacques Yakoub
- Jean-Francois Coquelet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Katleen Smedts
- Katrien Dickx
- Marleen Van Eygen -
- Laurent Lamouline
- Pieter Devolder
- Richard Francken
- Robin Merckx
Agenda
- Resolution of issues
Meeting Minutes
- Nathan presents himself as part of the INAMI team of Anne Nerenhausen working on the caresets
- Update of business rules V0.21, see in issue 219
- change for eAgreement to include links
- eAgreement: ReferenceID and ReceptionDate (when performer receives the response from advisory doctor)
- in serviceRequest a link to the claimResponse can be put (an update of the business rules is needed)
- medication lines that have an impact on the nursing templates (medication, posology and dosage)
- structured solution, not textual one, in the same way as in VIDIS - it is a temporary solution though as VIDIS has not been finalised yet
- separate new issues will be created to ensure follow up actions on each of these changes
- new field in logical model device on woundcare : action + type of material (attribute device)
- there will be 3 serviceRequests having a RequestGroup that groups the 3 of them
- or one ServiceRequest with some orderDetails ? TBC
- it will be clarified in the upcoming weeks as a meeting on this topic will happen next week
- new field in business rules Amamnesis
- prescription support information: are still present in the business rules/logical model
- ID and reason (reason of deviation on recommendation)
- New issues in Issue list
- Is orderDetail precise enough, see here
- some more meetings will happen to discuss each template
- Change on Requester field, see here
- modify to a BePractionerRole : agreed upon
- Add name/version of client software, see here
- looked at eHealth specification
- name and version will not be added in metadata as it is already present
- issue can be closed as no action is needed
- Unmapped fields, see here
- link to issue 218
- this can be solved in the same way as issue 218
- Namespace for identifier, see here
- INAMI security team has been consulted and is not confident on the proposed solution, ticket will be updated
- Body locations inconsistencies, see here
- inconsistencies will be resolved next week, they will be available in a new version of the business rules by next week
- CoSign, see here
- have the result been looked at ? industry still have to come back on this
- Route and device, see here
- info is in the new business rules
- Versioning and evolution of profiles, see here
- to be discussed and decided upon in FHIR Validation & Infrastructure WG
- close issue 169
- Modifications resulting from business rules will be applied in the logical model and profile
Agenda next meeting
- review update of logical model following the update of the business rules
- continue resolution of issues
Next meeting: next week Friday 21 April at 9AM