Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2020-09-17"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
RobinBosman (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (→Agenda) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Attendees ===== | ===== Attendees ===== | ||
− | |||
* Robin Bosman | * Robin Bosman | ||
* José Costa Teixeira | * José Costa Teixeira | ||
Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
* Arnaud Lippert | * Arnaud Lippert | ||
* Anne Nerenhausen | * Anne Nerenhausen | ||
− | + | * Karlien Erauw | |
− | |||
− | * | ||
* Nick Hermans | * Nick Hermans | ||
− | * | + | * Kristof Jaubin |
− | |||
− | + | ===== Excused ===== | |
* Philip Sidgwick | * Philip Sidgwick | ||
− | * | + | * Tim Weltens |
− | * | + | ===== Agenda ===== |
+ | * Updates on minor changes on existing artefacts http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/artifacts.html | ||
+ | ** Codesystem names : – naming has to be in singular, not in plural | ||
+ | ** optional requirement: possibility to link several request together – through FHIR requisition element | ||
− | + | * Focus on laboratory | |
− | * | + | ** Data analysis is ongoing at RIZIV, the logical datamodel is expected to be finished in 1/2 weeks |
+ | ** Do we cover the labo ordering in this WG or in the new working group HL7 BE FHIR Labo (focus on structured labo results) ? Fundamentals for orders will be discussed in this WG and then it will be handed over to the Labo WG | ||
+ | ** Labo order profile has been created: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription.html | ||
+ | ::* all elements have now been marked as must support | ||
+ | ::* preference on codes for the observations are explained in http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription-definitions.html#ServiceRequest.code | ||
+ | ::::* Loinc > Albert > laboratory owned code + mandatory text > only text | ||
+ | ::* specimen: no BE profiling yet, not sure if it is necessary – not in scope of this WG | ||
+ | ::* there are many different ways to do a labo order and labos thinks it works well – request on paper/ labo have requests on website / labo have modules o include in GP package | ||
+ | ::* Loinc has its own terminology servers, there seem not to any plans for terminology servers in BE | ||
+ | ::* Looking into : http://vas.ehealth.fgov.be/webretam/retam/home.htm?eventName=SEARCH_BY_ALBERT_CODE | ||
− | + | '''Next meeting: Oct 1, 4PM''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 16:05, 18 September 2020
Attendees
- Robin Bosman
- José Costa Teixeira
- Bruno Casneuf
- Arnaud Lippert
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Karlien Erauw
- Nick Hermans
- Kristof Jaubin
Excused
- Philip Sidgwick
- Tim Weltens
Agenda
- Updates on minor changes on existing artefacts http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/artifacts.html
- Codesystem names : – naming has to be in singular, not in plural
- optional requirement: possibility to link several request together – through FHIR requisition element
- Focus on laboratory
- Data analysis is ongoing at RIZIV, the logical datamodel is expected to be finished in 1/2 weeks
- Do we cover the labo ordering in this WG or in the new working group HL7 BE FHIR Labo (focus on structured labo results) ? Fundamentals for orders will be discussed in this WG and then it will be handed over to the Labo WG
- Labo order profile has been created: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription.html
- all elements have now been marked as must support
- preference on codes for the observations are explained in http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription-definitions.html#ServiceRequest.code
- Loinc > Albert > laboratory owned code + mandatory text > only text
- specimen: no BE profiling yet, not sure if it is necessary – not in scope of this WG
- there are many different ways to do a labo order and labos thinks it works well – request on paper/ labo have requests on website / labo have modules o include in GP package
- Loinc has its own terminology servers, there seem not to any plans for terminology servers in BE
- Looking into : http://vas.ehealth.fgov.be/webretam/retam/home.htm?eventName=SEARCH_BY_ALBERT_CODE
Next meeting: Oct 1, 4PM