Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2021-01-21"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Geoffrey Stenuit, Odissee, teacher of computer science | * Geoffrey Stenuit, Odissee, teacher of computer science | ||
* Robin Decoster, Odissee, education program & part of research group ZINN | * Robin Decoster, Odissee, education program & part of research group ZINN | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
===== Agenda ===== | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
− | * | + | * GP: current situation |
− | |||
− | |||
===== Minutes ===== | ===== Minutes ===== | ||
Line 50: | Line 45: | ||
::::::* be careful: there are legal implications on questionnaires (safety regulations) | ::::::* be careful: there are legal implications on questionnaires (safety regulations) | ||
::::* there are contra indications for specific examinations that should be asked prior to planning the appointment - relevant for examinations that require appointments months in advance | ::::* there are contra indications for specific examinations that should be asked prior to planning the appointment - relevant for examinations that require appointments months in advance | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Karen's documents are shared [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RIukasxa84FldjNO1Mfa_VZnfQdl3-5c/view?usp=sharing here (general referral form)], [https://drive.google.com/file/d/15YoEfGUHJsPxZFZ93NPGGZR_uGro__bJ/view?usp=sharing here (referral form for othopaedic problem)] and [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1kZyu51FJHO8tXkjIce7Blqb7tJSz7nfZ/view?usp=sharing here (referral form for internal problem)] | ||
Agenda next meeting: | Agenda next meeting: | ||
+ | * Trying to get onboard stakeholders from radiology | ||
* Missing information in the logical model for the medical imaging referral: klacht, vraagstelling, onderzoek, aanvullende info (denk aan nierfunctie, prothese, CI, etc) : to be discussed in detail next meeting | * Missing information in the logical model for the medical imaging referral: klacht, vraagstelling, onderzoek, aanvullende info (denk aan nierfunctie, prothese, CI, etc) : to be discussed in detail next meeting | ||
''' Date Next Meeting : Feb 4 at 4PM''' | ''' Date Next Meeting : Feb 4 at 4PM''' |
Latest revision as of 16:41, 24 January 2021
Attendees
- Robin Bosman, eHealth Platform
- Karlien Erauw, Agoria/IHE Belgium
- Pieter Devolder
- Arnaud Lippert
- Elfi Goesaert, Domus Medica
- Erwin Bellon, UZ Leuven
- José Costa Teixeira, chair HL7 Belgium
- Bruno Casneuf, recip-e
- Karen Anthonissen, GP (Domus Medica)
- Katleen Smedts, UZ Antwerpen
- Filip Deferme, UZ Antwerpen
- Geoffrey Stenuit, Odissee, teacher of computer science
- Robin Decoster, Odissee, education program & part of research group ZINN
Agenda
- GP: current situation
Minutes
- Presence of stakeholders: representation for the moment is +/- ok
- BSR would try to attend, unfortunately no one is present today. We will keep them posted of this WG's progress and ask them for feedback when we have a draft implementation guide
- Erwin suggests to do a walk through to the patient FHIR resource for the present stakeholders
- the logical model and the FHIR profile for the general referral have been drafted (see snapshot table for the best overview)
- a first draft of the logical model and the FHIR profile for the medical imaging referral are here
- Quick overview of FHIR by Robin by looking at the FHIR patient resource: typical is the way content is structured in FHIR, i.e. in modular form
- Karen had done some preparations prepared : how is the referral done by using the instruction document used by a GP now ?
- Karen has used softwareGP's careconnect & healthone that are very similar
- information from kidney function is automatically taken
- in border areas there are people from the Netherlands without rijksregisternummer
- what is crucial: body part + type of medical image/examination + contract (for GP)
- do the GP's want to specify deatils of the imagination or do they leave it up to the radiologist ?
- sometimes: GP mention artrosis in the remark section which is enough for the radiologists
- for mammographies other words are mentioned in the remark section
- does the GP get contacted by the radiologists ? it never happened for KAren
- do we need a list ?
- UZA has a list with examinations, like probably other hospitals
- link with Clinical Decision Support systems are being discussed
- is it an option to use the catalog from RIZIV?
- there is a need for a list but it seems not an action item for this WG to create it
- questionnaire: are there questionnaires that have to be completed prior to the examination
- does this happen at the hospital side ? not when the GP creates the referral
- for an MRI people need to fill out a questionnaire
- would be great if the questionnaire was completed upfront the examination
- GP will not like it if they have to fill out more than 4-5 questions, it would be great if the software system prefills questionnaires
- be careful: there are legal implications on questionnaires (safety regulations)
- there are contra indications for specific examinations that should be asked prior to planning the appointment - relevant for examinations that require appointments months in advance
- Karen's documents are shared here (general referral form), here (referral form for othopaedic problem) and here (referral form for internal problem)
Agenda next meeting:
- Trying to get onboard stakeholders from radiology
- Missing information in the logical model for the medical imaging referral: klacht, vraagstelling, onderzoek, aanvullende info (denk aan nierfunctie, prothese, CI, etc) : to be discussed in detail next meeting
Date Next Meeting : Feb 4 at 4PM