Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2021-11-16"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Attendees ===== | ===== Attendees ===== | ||
| + | * Alexis Van Zeveren (arrived late) | ||
* Dr Alain Derom | * Dr Alain Derom | ||
* Bart Decuypere | * Bart Decuypere | ||
| Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
===== Agenda ===== | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
| − | * | + | * Rework on issues resulted from the pilot phase |
===== Minutes ===== | ===== Minutes ===== | ||
| Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
::* testcases will be used in the future for the end-to-end solution | ::* testcases will be used in the future for the end-to-end solution | ||
| − | : Today we will deal with the issues having status "To Be Validated by WG" | + | * List of issues are listed are here: https://github.com/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/projects/1 |
| + | * Today we will deal with the issues having status "To Be Validated by WG" | ||
* Issue #18 Every bundle needs a unique identifier - how will be deal with this at national level, do we want to standardise this ? | * Issue #18 Every bundle needs a unique identifier - how will be deal with this at national level, do we want to standardise this ? | ||
::* combination of system and value has to be unique | ::* combination of system and value has to be unique | ||
Revision as of 16:17, 16 November 2021
Attendees
- Alexis Van Zeveren (arrived late)
- Dr Alain Derom
- Bart Decuypere
- Benny Verhamme
- Frédéric Istace
- Frederik Lenaerts
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Jean-Michel Polfiet
- Joost Van Averbeke
- Jos Bellen
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Kristof Jaubin
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Peter Laridon
- Robert Nicolas (Medispring)
- Thibault Mahieu
- Tom Tollenaere
- Stefan Waegemans
- Toon Schiemsky
Excused/Not present
- Frederik De Kegel
- Mieke Buckinx
- Olivier Lothaire
- Paul Neyens
- Richard Francken
- Theo Schumacher
- Tom Fiers
Agenda
- Rework on issues resulted from the pilot phase
Minutes
- Updates of the pilot phase of the Lab result project
- goal of the pilot: implementation proof documentation for the project
- 5 participants (2 GP softs + EPD soft + 2 LIS) + 2 biologists
- tracking of issues in github
- testcases will be used in the future for the end-to-end solution
- List of issues are listed are here: https://github.com/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/projects/1
- Today we will deal with the issues having status "To Be Validated by WG"
- Issue #18 Every bundle needs a unique identifier - how will be deal with this at national level, do we want to standardise this ?
- combination of system and value has to be unique
- Medina will remove the lab prefix : lab riziv number + unique number for the lab (f.e. riziv request number)
- HL7 Belgium has to work on naming system : HL7 Belgium will set this up in the way "this is the approved url as agreed" - it will be the identifier of the bundle, not the unique ID
- please note: one request cannot have 2 bundles as outcome
- the Bundles have to be unique, any reference identifiers in the bundle do not have to be unique ? They only have to be unique within the same bundle
- Issue #26 "Multilevel titles on protocols"
- a lab protocol has titles and none or multiple subtitles and each level can have results
- need for agreement on way of encoding
- proposal: using "hasMember" as this has been created to have hierarchy
- Issue #38 is almost the same issue "Subtitles and panels"
- nuance of narrative generation
- is there a need for a dummy narrative to a panel ?
- conclusion: if you have a child you have to use "hasMember"
- Narrative: the receiving party needs to be able to rebuild the protocol
- Macsys wants to leave the narrative empty - is this against the HL7 FHIR standard mandatory guidance ? Macsys will create plain text in the narrative
- copy of the protocol could be sent as a blob, not in the narrative
- Issue 34 about coding system to include in the observation
- can we use multiple ones ?
- link to coding system : FHIR allows Loinc, Albert or lab codes
- should we not determine how we have to identify lab coding systems - will Medidoc, Medigest codes be identified ?
- is there a repository page of the used lab coding systems ? needs to be created & option to be re-validated by this WG
- a terminology server could be an option for the future
Action items
- HL7 Belgium to make up naming system for identifier for bundles
- HL7 Belgium to make up repository page of the used lab coding systems
- HL7 Belgium to update status of discussed items
Next Meeting: additional meeting on Thursday Nov 25 at 1PM to make progress
