Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2022-10-25"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Line 90: Line 90:
  
 
* Open issues
 
* Open issues
::* does logical model need to be updated ?
+
::* work on logical model  
 
::* is the visualizer part of the standard ? if so, documentation will be necessary  
 
::* is the visualizer part of the standard ? if so, documentation will be necessary  
  

Revision as of 17:40, 25 October 2022

Attendees

  • Dr Alain Derom
  • Ardon Toonstra
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Christoff Nicque
  • Frédéric Istace
  • Hans De Keersmaecker
  • Ilse
  • Jean-Michel Polfiet
  • Jonathan Capitano
  • Jos Bellen
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Kristof Jaubin
  • Peter Laridon
  • Robert Nicolas
  • Theo Schumacher
  • Thibault Mahieu
  • Thomas Mellen
  • Tom Fiers
  • Tom Tollenaere

Excused/Not present

  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Bart Havermans
  • Filip Migom
  • Frederik De Kegel
  • Frederik Lenaerts -
  • Hendrik De Moor
  • Joost Van Averbeke
  • Lotte Adriaensen
  • Mieke Buckinx
  • Nick Hermans
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Philippe Cauchie
  • Olivier Lothaire
  • Paul Neyens
  • Richard Francken
  • Roland Vueghs
  • Stefan Waegemans
  • Toon Schiemsky
  • Veerle Claessens
  • Werner De Mulder

Agenda

  • Issue resolutions
  • New issues/questions from an open Q&A organised by the eHealth platform earlier this afternoon
  • other project request: analyse m.b.t. de ontiwkkeling van een nieuwe nationale database en applicatie m.b.t. antistoffen tegen rode bloedcellen en bloedplaatjes

Minutes

Context: since the publication of the profile mid September by eHealth platform, some new issues have been raised

Resolution of open issues: https://github.com/hl7-be/lab/issues

  • quick win for the visualizer: when opening the Service request when showing the file
  • please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and as such, not eligible for this kind of meeting
  • add postal codes to visualiser
  • please note that the visualiser is not part of the HL7 FHIR standard and as such, not eligible for this kind of meeting
  • a lab can have different activity centers but only 1 RIZIV number
  • has to be dealt with as part of BeOrganisation as part of the core profile
  • lab results related to blood transfusion
  • having a centralized database would be risky
  • tests regarding blood transfusions can be dealt with in this profile
  • our profile is for a diagnostic report - do we need to mention this in the guidance
  • eHealth platform will reverse engineer technical model to have a logical model and have it reviewed by the clinical biologists - any volunteers are welcomed
  • NL has already a logical model
  • Issue 144: raised by Philippe Cauchie on dynamic testing: more info (fro mMIPS) is needed
  • Issue 141: clarification from MIPS is needed
  • Issue 139: label from LOINC codes differ from those in RETAM
  • loinc numbers will be there, often being RETAM ; a description of the test will be a label that will depend on the lab performing the test, that description will not be the label
  • if the LOINC code is a RETAM code then the RETAM description will have to be used
  • results will be displayed next to one another, showing the RETAM label - which can be confusing
  • RETAM descriptions can be long though although there are short labels
  • --> the labs have to ensure to use the same label on the paper record and digital report
  • --> it is up to the GP softs to decide what they show when results come form different labs
  • this info will have to be included in the guidance
  • Open issues
  • work on logical model
  • is the visualizer part of the standard ? if so, documentation will be necessary

Agenda for next meeting:

  • wrap-up and resolution of any open issues if they arise

Next Meeting : TBC - in the upcoming weeks