Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Medication WG 2024-10-01"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Line 4: Line 4:
 
* Anne Nerenhausen
 
* Anne Nerenhausen
 
* Bart Decuypere
 
* Bart Decuypere
* Ilse Van Dossche (Healthdata, Sciensano)
+
* Ilse Dossche (Healthdata, Sciensano)
 
* Jan Lenie
 
* Jan Lenie
 
* Jens Penny
 
* Jens Penny

Revision as of 09:28, 1 October 2024

Attendees
  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Annemieke Vergauwe
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Ilse Dossche (Healthdata, Sciensano)
  • Jan Lenie
  • Jens Penny
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Loic Carlier
  • Marc Buckens
  • Nils D'hont
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Philippe Baise
  • Ruben Walraevens
  • Tom Henkens
  • Walter Bollaert
  • Will van Norel
Excused/Not present
  • Annabel Dompas
  • Bart Rondou
  • Benoit Van Houtte
  • Dieter Sauvillers
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Hans De Keersmaecker
  • Jacques Yakoub
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Katrien Thorré
  • Lodewijk Sioen
  • Nathan Peeters
  • Nils Devos
  • Marcelo Romero-Cors
  • Nick Hermans
  • Stephane Bouillon
  • Thomas Van Langendonck
  • Tom De Backer
  • Werner De Mulder
Agenda
  • Medication prescription in FHIR
Minutes
  • José updates the WG on the grouping of prescription request following discussions at international level
  • The business document has been shared with us by INAMI/RIZIV, see here
  • The logical model is here
  • we need to ensure the logical model is aligned with the business requirements
this document includes the results from the last discussions
  • for RIZIV there is 1-1 identifier, in other systems it can be 1 to many
  • this work is necessary before moving to publication
  • We create a new issue 217 as there will not always be a medication line, at least not in the beginning
  • There have been alignments with the VIDIS medication scheme project as well as with the caresets projects, both managed by RIZIV/INAMI
  • There was a meeting with the business experts last week. The last version of the Business rules are being finalised and will be shared with the WG next week.
  • will visi flag be part of the logical model or not ; it will be part of the access matrix ; for the moment we will not add it to the logical model
  • proposal to take visi flag out of all the caresets ; RIZIV to come up with a general proposal for the visi flag, see issue 194


  • We are looking into the issues and the pull requests
  • issue 204: we don't need the pull request
  • issue 202: pull request will be removed
  • issue 206: pull request will be removed

* Action items:

  • review logical model in alignment with the business document

Next meeting: 15 October at 11AM