Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Security WG 2024-11-20"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
 
Line 42: Line 42:
 
::* most important aspect of this issue is that aspects of pseudonymization is difficult to implement  
 
::* most important aspect of this issue is that aspects of pseudonymization is difficult to implement  
 
::::* every field that has a text field needs to be pseudonymized, it is up to the implementer to decide which field has to be pseudonymized
 
::::* every field that has a text field needs to be pseudonymized, it is up to the implementer to decide which field has to be pseudonymized
::::*  
+
::::* it is a consequence of the decision to not impact the profiles structure
 
+
::::* how can we resolve this: add some clarifications in the guidance
 +
::::::* can it be an idea for cookbooks to have guidance on which fields to be pseudonymized
 +
::::::* guidance of the master profile needs clarified
 +
::* guidance will be put together, once done the WG members will be notified by email
 +
::::* anyone can introduce any comment in github on this, we will follow up and organise a WG meeting if issues arise
  
 
===== Next agenda meeting agenda points =====
 
===== Next agenda meeting agenda points =====

Latest revision as of 11:14, 20 November 2024

Attendees
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Brian Thieren
  • Dominiek Leclerq
  • Erwin Bellon
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Maxime Caucheteur
  • Nick Hermans
  • Virginie Hayot
Excused/Not present
  • Annabel Dompas
  • Anthony Maton
  • Arne Van Eycken
  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Didier Témans
  • Elien De Koker
  • Jan Lenie
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Cyprien Janssens
  • Didier Temans
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Filip Veldeman
  • Filoretta Velica
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Jan Lenie
  • Jan Stinissen
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Marco Busschots
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Philippe Baise
  • Stef Hoofd
  • Steven Van den Berghe
Agenda
  • Resolve new issue 23
Minutes
  • most important aspect of this issue is that aspects of pseudonymization is difficult to implement
  • every field that has a text field needs to be pseudonymized, it is up to the implementer to decide which field has to be pseudonymized
  • it is a consequence of the decision to not impact the profiles structure
  • how can we resolve this: add some clarifications in the guidance
  • can it be an idea for cookbooks to have guidance on which fields to be pseudonymized
  • guidance of the master profile needs clarified
  • guidance will be put together, once done the WG members will be notified by email
  • anyone can introduce any comment in github on this, we will follow up and organise a WG meeting if issues arise
Next agenda meeting agenda points
  • only if new issues arise
Next meetings
  • TBC