Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2021-01-21"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Line 29: Line 29:
 
::* a first draft of the [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-model-diagnosticimagingprescription.html logical model] and the [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-referralprescription-diagnosticimaging.html FHIR profile] for the medical imaging referral are here
 
::* a first draft of the [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-model-diagnosticimagingprescription.html logical model] and the [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-referralprescription-diagnosticimaging.html FHIR profile] for the medical imaging referral are here
 
* Karen prepared already some typical examples
 
* Karen prepared already some typical examples
 
+
* Quick overview of FHIR by Robin by looking at the FHIR patient resource: typical is the way content is structured, i.e. in modular form
 +
* Karen: how is the referral done by using the instruction document used by a GP now ?
 +
::* Karen has used softwareGP's careconnect & healthone that are very similar
 +
::::* information from kidney function is automatically taken
 +
::::* in border areas there are people from the Netherlands without rijksregisternummer
 +
* what is crucial: body part + type of medical image/examination + contract (for GP)
 +
* do the GP's want to specify deatils of the imagination or do they leave it up to the radiologist ?
 +
::* sometimes: GP mention artrosis in the remark section which is enough for the radiologists
 +
::* for mammographies other words are mentioned in the remark section
 +
* does the GP get contacted by the radiologists ? it never happened
 +
* UZA has a list with examinations
 +
*
 
    
 
    
 
Agenda:
 
Agenda:

Revision as of 16:13, 21 January 2021

Attendees
  • Robin Bosman, eHealth Platform
  • Karlien Erauw, Agoria/IHE Belgium
  • Pieter Devolder
  • Arnaud Lippert
  • Elfi Goesaert, Domus Medica
  • Erwin Bellon, UZ Leuven
  • José Costa Teixeira, chair HL7 Belgium
  • Bruno Casneuf, recip-e
  • Karen Anthonissen, GP (Domus Medica)
  • Katleen Smedts, UZ Antwerpen
  • Filip Deferme, UZ Antwerpen
  • Geoffrey Stenuit, Odissee, teacher of computer science
  • Robin Decoster, Odissee, education program & part of research group ZINN
  • Nicolas Delvaux, GP/prof Medicine Univ Leuven (CDS & radiology (Domus Medica)
  • Nils Devos
Agenda
  • Roll call of attendees
  • Set context for referral for medical imaging
  • Assess representation of stakeholders & identify others
Minutes
  • BSR would try to attend, unfortunately no one is present today. We will keep them posted of this WG's progress
  • Presence of stakeholders: representation for the moment is +/- ok
  • Erwin suggests to do a walk through to the patient FHIR resource
  • Karen prepared already some typical examples
  • Quick overview of FHIR by Robin by looking at the FHIR patient resource: typical is the way content is structured, i.e. in modular form
  • Karen: how is the referral done by using the instruction document used by a GP now ?
  • Karen has used softwareGP's careconnect & healthone that are very similar
  • information from kidney function is automatically taken
  • in border areas there are people from the Netherlands without rijksregisternummer
  • what is crucial: body part + type of medical image/examination + contract (for GP)
  • do the GP's want to specify deatils of the imagination or do they leave it up to the radiologist ?
  • sometimes: GP mention artrosis in the remark section which is enough for the radiologists
  • for mammographies other words are mentioned in the remark section
  • does the GP get contacted by the radiologists ? it never happened
  • UZA has a list with examinations

Agenda:

  • Missing information in the logical model for the medical imaging referral: klacht, vraagstelling, onderzoek, aanvullende info (denk aan nierfunctie, prothese, CI, etc) : to be discussed in detail next meeting
  • Action items
  • representatives from GP's to bring real time examples of medical imaging referrals to the next meeting to identify missing fields in the model for the medical imaging referral

Next Meeting : Feb 4 at 4PM