Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Medication WG 2021-10-26"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===== '''Attendees''' ===== * Bart Decuypere * Bruno Casneuf * Jan Lenie * Jean-Michel Polfliet * Jens Penny * José Costa Teixeira * Karlien Erauw * Pablo Christiaens * Ri...") |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== '''Attendees''' ===== | ===== '''Attendees''' ===== | ||
| + | * Annemieke Vergauwe | ||
* Bart Decuypere | * Bart Decuypere | ||
* Bruno Casneuf | * Bruno Casneuf | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
* Jean-Michel Polfliet | * Jean-Michel Polfliet | ||
* Jens Penny | * Jens Penny | ||
| − | |||
* Karlien Erauw | * Karlien Erauw | ||
| + | * Marc Buckens | ||
* Pablo Christiaens | * Pablo Christiaens | ||
* Richard Francken | * Richard Francken | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
===== '''Excused/Not present''' ===== | ===== '''Excused/Not present''' ===== | ||
| − | |||
* Anne Nerenhausen | * Anne Nerenhausen | ||
* Dieter Sauvillers | * Dieter Sauvillers | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* Jean-Louis Maggetto | * Jean-Louis Maggetto | ||
* Jeroen De Wilde | * Jeroen De Wilde | ||
| + | * José Costa Teixeira | ||
* Katrien Thorré | * Katrien Thorré | ||
* Lars Vanreppelen | * Lars Vanreppelen | ||
| − | |||
* Nick Hermans | * Nick Hermans | ||
* Nils Devos | * Nils Devos | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
===== '''Agenda''' ===== | ===== '''Agenda''' ===== | ||
| − | * | + | * Work on scenario's |
* Future work items | * Future work items | ||
===== '''Minutes''' ===== | ===== '''Minutes''' ===== | ||
| − | * | + | * Pablo sent [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J0p2gxTo8dP7q_SW0egYBniMa9VSUr0Y/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=105469359652835948544&rtpof=true&sd=true 3 scenario's], we discuss them |
| − | ::* | + | * All 3 scenario's are about a twisted ankle |
| − | + | ::* do we need to put the indication ? one medication can be taken for multiple indiciations | |
| − | * | + | ::* we need a placeholder for the indication, free text - it is mandatory |
| − | ::* | + | ::* what is the use case ? based on therapautic line |
| − | ::::* | + | * Scenario 2: patient has already multiple therapeutic lines |
| − | ::::* the | + | ::* chronic backpain |
| − | ::::* | + | ::* twisted ankle: pain relief medication |
| − | + | ::* 1 medication on 2 therapeutic lines | |
| − | * | + | ::* you don't know what applies to what |
| − | ::* | + | ::::* it is the business question: does one need to add the doses ? |
| − | ::* | + | * Scenario 3: person with a lot of medical history |
| − | + | ::* plenty of therapeutic lines | |
| − | * | + | ::* do we need to capture the history in the medication scheme ? |
| − | + | ::* 3 therapeutic lines that are linked - these are foreseen in the sumehr (as medication history as free text) - do you need to connect the medication ? | |
| − | + | ::* what will the medication sheme be used for ? | |
| + | ::::* there should be a patient friendly print-out for the patient, which will be a different view of the medication scheme | ||
| + | ::::* history can be of value for GP and pharmacist | ||
| + | ::::* how will the GP use this ? | ||
| + | ::::::* re-use therapeutic line | ||
| + | ::::::* start new therapeutic line | ||
| + | ::::* it is not because computer systems keep history eternally that the eternal history has to be displayed - only history that has relevance should be displayed, has to be determined by the application that shows the medication (timeframe, specific datasets, ...) | ||
| + | ::::::* not having the medication history (when manually deleted) today is painful | ||
| + | * Due to José's absence the questions/open issues have been listed and they will be further discussed during our next meeting | ||
'''Action items for next meeting''' | '''Action items for next meeting''' | ||
| − | * | + | Discuss open questions |
| + | * is indication mandatory ? | ||
| + | * what with multiple indications in multiple therapeutic lines ? | ||
| + | * how to capture the history in the medication scheme ? | ||
| − | '''Next meeting | + | '''Next meeting Nov 9 at 11AM''' |
Latest revision as of 09:34, 26 October 2021
Attendees
- Annemieke Vergauwe
- Bart Decuypere
- Bruno Casneuf
- Jan Lenie
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Jens Penny
- Karlien Erauw
- Marc Buckens
- Pablo Christiaens
- Richard Francken
- Tom Henkens
Excused/Not present
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Dieter Sauvillers
- Elhassan Baazizi
- Hanne Vuegen
- Jean-Louis Maggetto
- Jeroen De Wilde
- José Costa Teixeira
- Katrien Thorré
- Lars Vanreppelen
- Nick Hermans
- Nils Devos
- Thomas Van Langendonck
- Tom De Backer
- Will van Norel
Agenda
- Work on scenario's
- Future work items
Minutes
- Pablo sent 3 scenario's, we discuss them
- All 3 scenario's are about a twisted ankle
- do we need to put the indication ? one medication can be taken for multiple indiciations
- we need a placeholder for the indication, free text - it is mandatory
- what is the use case ? based on therapautic line
- Scenario 2: patient has already multiple therapeutic lines
- chronic backpain
- twisted ankle: pain relief medication
- 1 medication on 2 therapeutic lines
- you don't know what applies to what
- it is the business question: does one need to add the doses ?
- Scenario 3: person with a lot of medical history
- plenty of therapeutic lines
- do we need to capture the history in the medication scheme ?
- 3 therapeutic lines that are linked - these are foreseen in the sumehr (as medication history as free text) - do you need to connect the medication ?
- what will the medication sheme be used for ?
- there should be a patient friendly print-out for the patient, which will be a different view of the medication scheme
- history can be of value for GP and pharmacist
- how will the GP use this ?
- re-use therapeutic line
- start new therapeutic line
- it is not because computer systems keep history eternally that the eternal history has to be displayed - only history that has relevance should be displayed, has to be determined by the application that shows the medication (timeframe, specific datasets, ...)
- not having the medication history (when manually deleted) today is painful
- Due to José's absence the questions/open issues have been listed and they will be further discussed during our next meeting
Action items for next meeting Discuss open questions
- is indication mandatory ?
- what with multiple indications in multiple therapeutic lines ?
- how to capture the history in the medication scheme ?
Next meeting Nov 9 at 11AM
