Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2022-01-18"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Line 60: Line 60:
 
::* https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/branches/issue-65/StructureDefinition-be-observation-laboratory.html#tabs-diff
 
::* https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/branches/issue-65/StructureDefinition-be-observation-laboratory.html#tabs-diff
  
* The group agrees on this resolution using annotation code
+
* The group agrees on this resolutions using annotation code
 
* The following are the agreed values for the valueset to start with: lab-test-accreditation, lab-test-subcontractor , lab-referencerange-comment
 
* The following are the agreed values for the valueset to start with: lab-test-accreditation, lab-test-subcontractor , lab-referencerange-comment
 
* There are comments regarding the test that are put in the note field
 
* There are comments regarding the test that are put in the note field

Revision as of 18:16, 18 January 2022

Attendees

  • TBD
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Frédéric Istace
  • Frederik De Kegel
  • Frederik Lenaerts
  • Hans De Keersmaecker
  • Hendrik De Moor
  • Jean-Michel Polfiet
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Kristof Jaubin
  • Lotte Adriaensen
  • Olivier Lothaire
  • Peter Laridon
  • Philippe Cauchie
  • Roland Vueghs
  • Sven Bisaro
  • Thibault Mahieu
  • Tom Tollenaere
  • Veerle Claessens
  • Yulia Shornikova

Excused/Not present

  • Dr Alain Derom
  • Alexis Van Zeveren
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Filip Migom
  • Joost Van Averbeke
  • Jos Bellen
  • Mieke Buckinx
  • Nick Hermans
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Paul Neyens
  • Peter Laridon
  • Richard Francken
  • Robert Nicolas
  • Theo Schumacher
  • Tom Fiers
  • Toon Schiemsky
  • Richard Francken
  • Stefan Waegemans
  • Werner De Mulder

Agenda

  • Discuss proposed solutions on issues #64 and #65 as sent out by email on Jan 14

Minutes

  • Up-to-date list of issues can be consulted here
  • Issue 64 : proposed solution: :
  • Issue 65 : proposed solution:
  • The group agrees on this resolutions using annotation code
  • The following are the agreed values for the valueset to start with: lab-test-accreditation, lab-test-subcontractor , lab-referencerange-comment
  • There are comments regarding the test that are put in the note field
  • the note can still be used as a plain text field since annotation code is optional
  • plain text with 2 annotation code is possible as 3 notes as it is 1 to many
  • Observation - text: markdown : you can plain text or any markdown (string <> plain text - html can be put in string)
  • end user can see weird characters
  • We try is we can put markdown as string as it is not our objective to use markdown in Belgium : is not possible, so we need to add something in guidance : plain text without markdown is strongly recommended
  • Issue #75: empty narrative
  • the lab must enter data in the narrative - if we put info in the narrative then we have to test that the info is correct !
  • narratives should not be in the scope of the testing
  • risk that receiving party will use the narrative instead of the coded info
  • up until now nothing has been set what part of the protocol to put where in the narrative
  • narrative can be empty for machine-to-machine communication
  • change narrative into empty
  • Issue 74 : embed info is possible in 2 ways in FHIR - proposal :
  • use presented form to send the protocol/human readable copy here (in PDF/word)
  • use media for other annexes


Next Meeting: on Tuesday Feb 1 4PM

Meetings will happen again biweekly