Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2022-03-22"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
::* does Belgium will only do this in an unstructured way ? no, structured microbiology reporting should be looked into as this is valuable | ::* does Belgium will only do this in an unstructured way ? no, structured microbiology reporting should be looked into as this is valuable | ||
::::* how many Snomed CT codes are needed ? it seems that there are +/- 200 | ::::* how many Snomed CT codes are needed ? it seems that there are +/- 200 | ||
| + | ::* there will have to be in the implementation guide | ||
| + | |||
TBC | TBC | ||
| Line 86: | Line 88: | ||
::::::* interpretation is a codeable concept but there is also a value - put in the value | ::::::* interpretation is a codeable concept but there is also a value - put in the value | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Line 101: | Line 94: | ||
* come to a consensus on the open issues - please have a look at the proposed solution for the issues in status "To be validated by WG" | * come to a consensus on the open issues - please have a look at the proposed solution for the issues in status "To be validated by WG" | ||
| − | '''Next Meeting - next week as there are some open issues: on Tuesday March | + | '''Next Meeting - next week as there are still some open issues: on Tuesday March 29 - at 4PM''' |
Revision as of 15:31, 22 March 2022
Attendees
- Dr Alain Derom
- Bart Decuypere
- Frederik De Kegel
- Frederik Lenaerts
- Hans De Keersmaecker
- Jean-Michel Polfiet
- Jos Bellen
- Karlien Erauw
- Kristof Jaubin
- Lotte Adriaensen
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze (arrived late)
- Olivier Lothaire
- Peter Laridon
- Philippe Cauchie
- Stefan Waegemans
- Sven Bisaro
- Thibault Mahieu
- Tom Tollenaere
Excused/Not present
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Bart Havermans
- Benny Verhamme
- Filip Migom
- Frédéric Istace
- Hendrik De Moor
- Joost Van Averbeke
- José Costa Teixeira
- Mieke Buckinx
- Nick Hermans
- Paul Neyens
- Richard Francken
- Robert Nicolas
- Roland Vueghs
- Theo Schumacher
- Tom Fiers
- Toon Schiemsky
- Veerle Claessens
- Werner De Mulder
- Yulia Shornikova
Agenda
- Discuss and resolve open issues
Minutes
Resolution of open issues: https://github.com/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/projects/1
- Issue 98 - accreditation comment
- what is really required for the Belac accreditation ?
- do we need a general accr comment for the entire report
- if we keep the comment on the result level
- Answers - was already covered before, see all BELAC details here
- Belac requires your accr nbr
- Belac requires info at test level
- Belac requires to put more info in the "footer" ; behind every test you can put more details
- experiences abroad: see question in FHIR chat - CLIA in the US, see here
- Issue 105 - DNA info :
- add it to note to BeLaboratroyObservation level
- validate tomorrow with UZ Gent on 23/3
- Issue 105 - microbiology reporting :
- it is in the scope of the pilot
- structured microbiology lab reporting might be very difficult for some lab/LIS vendors
- for some labs it would require a big change in the microbiology reporting
- it is not an official viewpoint of the vendors
- is a blob an option until the lab is ready for structured microbiology ? the labs will need the time for this change
- structured microbiology reporting is possible and the pilot has a proposal/way of working
- does Belgium will only do this in an unstructured way ? no, structured microbiology reporting should be looked into as this is valuable
- how many Snomed CT codes are needed ? it seems that there are +/- 200
- there will have to be in the implementation guide
TBC
- Issue 105 - microbiology reporting :
- put observation under report results, so you can put antibiotic results that are also put as an observation
- add an intermediate level and to be tested (MIPS at UZ Gent & CHU Charleroi)
- Questions that are open since a while - see issue 105
- Q1:
- Q2: what do other countries do about microbiology
- Q3: is snomed CT code mandatory for germs code
- Q4: integration of RIS or IRS : would be an integration of an additional system...
- all narrative answers must be supported, must be accepted - digital report should have the same content as paper reports
- there is a codesystem for the antibiotic values
- interpretation is a codeable concept but there is also a value - put in the value
Agenda for next meeting:
- come to a consensus on the open issues - please have a look at the proposed solution for the issues in status "To be validated by WG"
Next Meeting - next week as there are still some open issues: on Tuesday March 29 - at 4PM
