Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Medication WG 2020-06-23"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
===== Meeting Minutes ===== | ===== Meeting Minutes ===== | ||
| − | * Initial question on cardinalities | + | * Initial question on cardinalities: suggestion to restrict some cardinalities as there are several 0-many ones, no list has been provided yet. An additional flag has been added (must support). How widely adopted is the must support flag ? If something is relevant, it should be on the logical model and are flagged must support. All clinical relevant information should be in the “must support” fields, is pointed out. We might clarify that this in the way of working of HL7 Belgium. Be careful that everything is extendable. There is no simple way of marking that you cannot extend but you have to do it everywhere. If we constrain too much, people will tend to deviate too much |
* Review of recent updates on medication dispense profile, see [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-medication/branches/master/StructureDefinition-be-medicationdispense.html here] | * Review of recent updates on medication dispense profile, see [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-medication/branches/master/StructureDefinition-be-medicationdispense.html here] | ||
| + | :: * Identifier – dispense GUID, has now a url for system identification: https://www.gfd-dpp.be/fhir/reference/sguid | ||
Revision as of 09:48, 23 June 2020
Contents
Attendees
- Jan Lenie
- Tom Henkens
- Marc Buckens
- Annemieke Vergauwe
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Robin Bosman
- Elhassan Baazizi
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Tricarico
- Will van Norel
- Richard Francken
Excused
- Jens Penny
Agenda
- Review of recent updates on medication dispense profile
- Review of updates on medication profile
- Status of medication scheme/medication list
- AOB
Meeting Minutes
- Initial question on cardinalities: suggestion to restrict some cardinalities as there are several 0-many ones, no list has been provided yet. An additional flag has been added (must support). How widely adopted is the must support flag ? If something is relevant, it should be on the logical model and are flagged must support. All clinical relevant information should be in the “must support” fields, is pointed out. We might clarify that this in the way of working of HL7 Belgium. Be careful that everything is extendable. There is no simple way of marking that you cannot extend but you have to do it everywhere. If we constrain too much, people will tend to deviate too much
- Review of recent updates on medication dispense profile, see here
- * Identifier – dispense GUID, has now a url for system identification: https://www.gfd-dpp.be/fhir/reference/sguid
