Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2020-09-17"

Revision as of 16:02, 18 September 2020

Updates on minor changes on existing artefacts http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/artifacts.html
- Codesystem names : – naming has to be in singular, not in plural
- optional requirement: possibility to link several request together – through FHIR requisition element

Focus on laboratory
- Data analysis is ongoing at RIZIV, the logical datamodel is expected to be finished in 1/2 weeks
- Do we cover the labo ordering in this WG or in the new working group HL7 BE FHIR Labo (focus on structured labo results) ?

Fundamentals for orders will be discussed in this WG and then it will be handed over to the Labo WG

specimen: no BE profiling yet, not sure if it is necessary – not in scope of this WG
there are many different ways to do a labo order and labos thinks it works well – request on paper/ labo have requests on website / labo have modules o include in GP package
Loinc has its own terminology servers, there seem not to any plans for terminology servers in BE
Looking into : http://vas.ehealth.fgov.be/webretam/retam/home.htm?eventName=SEARCH_BY_ALBERT_CODE

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 ** Data analysis is ongoing at RIZIV, the logical datamodel is expected to be finished in 1/2 weeks
 ** Do we cover the labo ordering in this WG or in the new working group HL7 BE FHIR Labo (focus on structured labo results) ?
-::*Fundamentals for orders will be discussed in this WG and then it will be handed over to the Labo WG
+::* Fundamentals for orders will be discussed in this WG and then it will be handed over to the Labo WG
 ** Labo order profile has been created: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-lab-prescription.html
 ::* all elements have now been marked as must support