Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2020-10-09"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ===== Attendees ===== | + | ===== Attendees (#27) ===== |
* José Costa Teixeira, HL7 Belgium | * José Costa Teixeira, HL7 Belgium | ||
* Karlien Erauw, Agoria/HL7 & IHE Belgium | * Karlien Erauw, Agoria/HL7 & IHE Belgium | ||
* Pieter Devolder, IHE Belgium | * Pieter Devolder, IHE Belgium | ||
* Robin Bosman, eHealth Platform | * Robin Bosman, eHealth Platform | ||
− | * | + | * Jos Bellen, UZ Brussel |
+ | * Jamie Verelst, UZ Brussel | ||
* Paul Neyens, UZ Leuven | * Paul Neyens, UZ Leuven | ||
− | * UZ | + | * Kristof Jaubin, UZ Leuven |
− | * | + | * Filip Migoms, MIPS |
− | + | * Thibault Mahieu, MIPS | |
− | * MIPS | + | * Alexandre Schiltz, MIPS |
− | * MIPS | ||
* Andries Dumont, Intersystems | * Andries Dumont, Intersystems | ||
− | * Corilus | + | * Hans De Keersmaecker, Corilus |
* Philippe Cauchie, CHU Charleroi | * Philippe Cauchie, CHU Charleroi | ||
* Frederik Lenaerts, Amaron | * Frederik Lenaerts, Amaron | ||
+ | * Dieter De Gruyter, Amaron | ||
+ | * Mieke Buckinx, NexuzHealth | ||
+ | * Peter Laridon, eHealth Platform | ||
+ | * Filip Jacobs, UZ Gent | ||
+ | * David Van Praet, UZ Gent | ||
+ | * Benny Verhamme, UZ Gent | ||
+ | * Frederic Istace, CGM | ||
+ | * Theo Schumacher, CGM | ||
+ | * Olivier Lothaire, CGM | ||
+ | * David Levêque | ||
+ | * Dr Alain Derom | ||
+ | * Frank Vandewiele, Xperthis | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Excused ===== | ||
+ | * Nick Hermans, UZ Leuven | ||
===== Agenda ===== | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
Line 25: | Line 40: | ||
===== Minutes ===== | ===== Minutes ===== | ||
* Karlien Erauw welcomes the audience and introduces briefly HL7 Belgium and the purpose and way of working of its working groups | * Karlien Erauw welcomes the audience and introduces briefly HL7 Belgium and the purpose and way of working of its working groups | ||
+ | * Context: | ||
+ | :: The eHealth platform has prioritized the structured exchange of laboratory reports. Goal is to implement by end of July 2021. | ||
+ | As such, there's a need to have a clear view on our use of content standards by the end of October/early November. | ||
+ | :: HL7 FHIR has been chosen as the technical standard in this project. This means that the standardization effort involves FHIR profiling and guidance. This is the scope of this new HL7 FHIR working group within HL7 Belgium. | ||
* Setting the scene by Robin Bosman | * Setting the scene by Robin Bosman | ||
+ | * Important remark: architectectural concepts are not the scope of this WG | ||
+ | * Some discusscions | ||
+ | ::* Syntax of diagnostic report is at maturity level 3 in FHIR. This means that there is already some testing done. | ||
+ | ::* There is a ifference between FHIR profiling and FHIR extensions. Extensions can cause interoperability issues, profiling not. | ||
+ | ::* FHIR has plenty of libraries available, see [https://confluence.hl7.org/display/FHIR/Open+Source+Implementations here]. For a FHIR server there is no difference betweenw json or xml and you get exactly the same result. This is the advantage of FHIR | ||
+ | ::* How are we going to be interoperable with outside of Belgium, in Europe (~Z segment) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The logical model will have to be composed, first draft to be expected in upcoming weeks | ||
+ | * Structure definition: see [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-laboratory-report/StructureDefinition-be-laboratory-report.html here] | ||
+ | ::* note: the differential table shows the difference between the (international) profile and the Belgian profile | ||
+ | * Action items | ||
+ | ::* If you are familiar with FHIR: start looking at the examples, xml representation | ||
+ | ::::* to check if all elements of a lab report are mapped in the implementation guides | ||
+ | ::* For HL7 FHIR beginners, check out the free FHIR workshops offered on November 3 and 4 during the [https://www.agoria.be/en/eHealth/mHealth-Plugathon-3-4-November-2020 eHealth plugathon] | ||
'''Next meeting: Monday, October 19 at 4PM''' | '''Next meeting: Monday, October 19 at 4PM''' | ||
* Contact [http://mailto:Karlien.Erauw@agoria.be Karlien Erauw] for the dial-in details if you have not received the meeting invite | * Contact [http://mailto:Karlien.Erauw@agoria.be Karlien Erauw] for the dial-in details if you have not received the meeting invite |
Revision as of 05:45, 14 October 2020
Contents
Attendees (#27)
- José Costa Teixeira, HL7 Belgium
- Karlien Erauw, Agoria/HL7 & IHE Belgium
- Pieter Devolder, IHE Belgium
- Robin Bosman, eHealth Platform
- Jos Bellen, UZ Brussel
- Jamie Verelst, UZ Brussel
- Paul Neyens, UZ Leuven
- Kristof Jaubin, UZ Leuven
- Filip Migoms, MIPS
- Thibault Mahieu, MIPS
- Alexandre Schiltz, MIPS
- Andries Dumont, Intersystems
- Hans De Keersmaecker, Corilus
- Philippe Cauchie, CHU Charleroi
- Frederik Lenaerts, Amaron
- Dieter De Gruyter, Amaron
- Mieke Buckinx, NexuzHealth
- Peter Laridon, eHealth Platform
- Filip Jacobs, UZ Gent
- David Van Praet, UZ Gent
- Benny Verhamme, UZ Gent
- Frederic Istace, CGM
- Theo Schumacher, CGM
- Olivier Lothaire, CGM
- David Levêque
- Dr Alain Derom
- Frank Vandewiele, Xperthis
Excused
- Nick Hermans, UZ Leuven
Agenda
- Context
- HL7 FHIR as technical standard
- Related HL7 published guidelines
- Approach of HL7 Belgium
- Action items
Minutes
- Karlien Erauw welcomes the audience and introduces briefly HL7 Belgium and the purpose and way of working of its working groups
- Context:
- The eHealth platform has prioritized the structured exchange of laboratory reports. Goal is to implement by end of July 2021.
As such, there's a need to have a clear view on our use of content standards by the end of October/early November.
- HL7 FHIR has been chosen as the technical standard in this project. This means that the standardization effort involves FHIR profiling and guidance. This is the scope of this new HL7 FHIR working group within HL7 Belgium.
- Setting the scene by Robin Bosman
- Important remark: architectectural concepts are not the scope of this WG
- Some discusscions
- Syntax of diagnostic report is at maturity level 3 in FHIR. This means that there is already some testing done.
- There is a ifference between FHIR profiling and FHIR extensions. Extensions can cause interoperability issues, profiling not.
- FHIR has plenty of libraries available, see here. For a FHIR server there is no difference betweenw json or xml and you get exactly the same result. This is the advantage of FHIR
- How are we going to be interoperable with outside of Belgium, in Europe (~Z segment)
- The logical model will have to be composed, first draft to be expected in upcoming weeks
- Structure definition: see here
- note: the differential table shows the difference between the (international) profile and the Belgian profile
- Action items
- If you are familiar with FHIR: start looking at the examples, xml representation
- to check if all elements of a lab report are mapped in the implementation guides
- For HL7 FHIR beginners, check out the free FHIR workshops offered on November 3 and 4 during the eHealth plugathon
Next meeting: Monday, October 19 at 4PM
- Contact Karlien Erauw for the dial-in details if you have not received the meeting invite