Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Referral WG 2021-01-21"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::* a first draft of the [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-model-diagnosticimagingprescription.html logical model] and the [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-referralprescription-diagnosticimaging.html FHIR profile] for the medical imaging referral are here | ::* a first draft of the [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-model-diagnosticimagingprescription.html logical model] and the [http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-referral-prescription/StructureDefinition-be-referralprescription-diagnosticimaging.html FHIR profile] for the medical imaging referral are here | ||
* Karen prepared already some typical examples | * Karen prepared already some typical examples | ||
− | + | * Quick overview of FHIR by Robin by looking at the FHIR patient resource: typical is the way content is structured, i.e. in modular form | |
+ | * Karen: how is the referral done by using the instruction document used by a GP now ? | ||
+ | ::* Karen has used softwareGP's careconnect & healthone that are very similar | ||
+ | ::::* information from kidney function is automatically taken | ||
+ | ::::* in border areas there are people from the Netherlands without rijksregisternummer | ||
+ | * what is crucial: body part + type of medical image/examination + contract (for GP) | ||
+ | * do the GP's want to specify deatils of the imagination or do they leave it up to the radiologist ? | ||
+ | ::* sometimes: GP mention artrosis in the remark section which is enough for the radiologists | ||
+ | ::* for mammographies other words are mentioned in the remark section | ||
+ | * does the GP get contacted by the radiologists ? it never happened | ||
+ | * UZA has a list with examinations | ||
+ | * | ||
Agenda: | Agenda: |
Revision as of 16:13, 21 January 2021
Attendees
- Robin Bosman, eHealth Platform
- Karlien Erauw, Agoria/IHE Belgium
- Pieter Devolder
- Arnaud Lippert
- Elfi Goesaert, Domus Medica
- Erwin Bellon, UZ Leuven
- José Costa Teixeira, chair HL7 Belgium
- Bruno Casneuf, recip-e
- Karen Anthonissen, GP (Domus Medica)
- Katleen Smedts, UZ Antwerpen
- Filip Deferme, UZ Antwerpen
- Geoffrey Stenuit, Odissee, teacher of computer science
- Robin Decoster, Odissee, education program & part of research group ZINN
- Nicolas Delvaux, GP/prof Medicine Univ Leuven (CDS & radiology (Domus Medica)
- Nils Devos
Agenda
- Roll call of attendees
- Set context for referral for medical imaging
- Assess representation of stakeholders & identify others
Minutes
- BSR would try to attend, unfortunately no one is present today. We will keep them posted of this WG's progress
- Presence of stakeholders: representation for the moment is +/- ok
- Erwin suggests to do a walk through to the patient FHIR resource
- the logical model and the FHIR profile for the general referral have been drafted (see snapshot table for the best overview)
- a first draft of the logical model and the FHIR profile for the medical imaging referral are here
- Karen prepared already some typical examples
- Quick overview of FHIR by Robin by looking at the FHIR patient resource: typical is the way content is structured, i.e. in modular form
- Karen: how is the referral done by using the instruction document used by a GP now ?
- Karen has used softwareGP's careconnect & healthone that are very similar
- information from kidney function is automatically taken
- in border areas there are people from the Netherlands without rijksregisternummer
- what is crucial: body part + type of medical image/examination + contract (for GP)
- do the GP's want to specify deatils of the imagination or do they leave it up to the radiologist ?
- sometimes: GP mention artrosis in the remark section which is enough for the radiologists
- for mammographies other words are mentioned in the remark section
- does the GP get contacted by the radiologists ? it never happened
- UZA has a list with examinations
Agenda:
- Missing information in the logical model for the medical imaging referral: klacht, vraagstelling, onderzoek, aanvullende info (denk aan nierfunctie, prothese, CI, etc) : to be discussed in detail next meeting
- Action items
- representatives from GP's to bring real time examples of medical imaging referrals to the next meeting to identify missing fields in the model for the medical imaging referral
Next Meeting : Feb 4 at 4PM