Minutes - Medication WG 2021-05-11
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Attendees
- Bruno Casneuf
- Dieter Sauvillers
- Elhassan Baazizi
- Hanne Vuegen
- Jean-Louis Maggetto
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Jens Penny
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Pablo Christiaens
- Richard Francken
- Robin Bosman
- Tom De Backer
- Tom Henkens
- Will van Norel
Excused/Not present
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Annemieke Vergauwe
- Jan Lenie
- Jeroen De Wilde
- Lars Vanreppelen
- Marc Buckens
- Nils Devos
Agenda
- feedback on the model
Minutes
- Magistral preparations: no update
- What is the purpose and intent of the high level modelling towards the scope of the medication scheme project and exchange of the related MS information, including the outcome
- the purpose of the logical model is having a common understanding what the data means apart from the FHIR modelling
- logical model is perceived as a flow
- What do we want to achieve here ? the MS, the careplan, ...
- the purpose is to achieve the MS
- are we going to translate kmehr to FHIR ? lots of risks
- starting from something completely new: we risk to lose data fromo the past
- can the care plan be left out from this WG ?
- We miss the definition of the MS
- currently the MS in kmehr is visualised in a document
*
- Definitions related to Medication Scheme: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/riziv-medication-record/toc.html
- not updated on https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-medication/branches/master/medicationrecord-definitions.html yet
- treatment item is now treatment line
- treatment is not about allergies, is what the doctor prescribes, can be updated by someone else (optional)
- treatment consists of treatment lines
- treatment lines: do we split this by indication ? TBC
- treatment summary: will have lines but different lines, different from what one doctor intended
- patient can have different treatments, a treatment can be updated by different doctors
- Medication summary can be constructed by a system or by a person
- Medication Record has all the data related to usage of medication of a person
- who owns the treatment line ? the doctor but it can be updated by other doctors
- an indication might be linked to a treatment, it is not mandatory: none to multiple indications are possible
- use of word treatment is not correct in its scientific way but is linked to the usage of a medication
- How does het Medication Scheme fit here ? José is showing data model of medication record: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/riziv-medication-record/medicationrecord-data-model.html
- use case #1: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/riziv-medication-record/medicationrecord-scenario-1.html : a medication for 3 different indications ; what does the summary have to show ? is this 3 or 1 treatments ?
- José is showing the FHIR resources: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/riziv-medication-record/medicationrecord-fhir-resources.html
- Usage statement: here patient can indicate that he doesn't take the medication or that he only takes half of the dose
- Remark: the current implementation of the medication scheme is less complex but causes already plenty of issues in the field
- Question: do we need 1 central repository ? No, to be discussed in detail next meeting
Action items for next meeting
- each one of us to check offline and with his team to continue discussion on treatment lines
Next meeting May 11 at 11AM