Minutes - Referral WG 2023-04-14

Attendees

• Anne Nerenhausen
• Bart Decuypere
• Bart Reekmans
• Dorsan de Fabricheckers
• Emily Sevrin
• Geert Vandenhole
• Jean-Michel Polfliet
• Julien Beard
• Karlien Erauw
• Katrien Thorré
• Lionel Cremer
• Maarten Cobbaert
• Maxime Daive
• Nathan Peeters (INAMI)
• Pablo Christiaens
• Philippe Baise
• Philippe Lejoly

Excused

• Anthony Maton
• Ben Goosse
• Christophe Behaegel
• Cyprien Janssens
• Hans De Keersmaecker
• Jacques Yakoub
• Jean-Francois Coquelet
• José Costa Teixeira
• Katleen Smedts
• Katrien Dickx
• Marleen Van Eygen -
• Laurent Lamouline
• Pieter Devolder
• Richard Francken
• Robin Merckx

Agenda

• Resolution of issues

Meeting Minutes

• Nathan presents himself as part of the INAMI team of Anne Nerenhausen working on the caresets
• Update of business rules V0.21, see in issue 219

• change for eAgreement to include links

• eAgreement: ReferenceID and ReceptionDate (when performer receives the response from advisory doctor)
• in serviceRequest a link to the claimResponse can be put (an update of the business rules is needed)

• medication lines that have an impact on the nursing templates (medication, posology and dosage)

• structured solution, not textual one, in the same way as in VIDIS - it is a temporary solution though as VIDIS has not been finalised yet

• separate new issues will be created to ensure follow up actions on each of these changes

• new field in logical model device on woundcare : action + type of material (attribute device)

• there will be 3 serviceRequests having a RequestGroup that groups the 3 of them

• or one ServiceRequest with some orderDetails ? TBC

• it will be clarified in the upcoming weeks as a meeting on this topic will happen next week

• new field in business rules Amamnesis
• prescription support information: are still present in the business rules/logical model

• ID and reason (reason of deviation on recommendation)

• New issues in Issue list
• Is orderDetail precise enough, see here

• some more meetings will happen to discuss each template

• Change on Requester field, see here

• modify to a BePractionerRole : agreed upon

• Add name/version of client software, see here

• looked at eHealth specification
• name and version will not be added in metadata as it is already present
• issue can be closed as no action is needed

• Unmapped fields, see here

• link to issue 218
• this can be solved in the same way as issue 218

• Namespace for identifier, see here

• INAMI security team has been consulted and is not confident on the proposed solution, ticket will be updated

• Body locations inconsistencies, see here

• inconsistencies will be resolved next week, they will be available in a new version of the business rules by next week

• CoSign, see here

• have the result been looked at ? industry still have to come back on this

• Route and device, see here

• info is in the new business rules

• Versioning and evolution of profiles, see here

• to be discussed and decided upon in FHIR Validation & Infrastructure WG

• close issue 169
• Modifications resulting from business rules will be applied in the logical model and profile

Agenda next meeting

• review update of logical model following the update of the business rules
• continue resolution of issues

Next meeting: next week Friday 21 April at 9AM