Minutes - Medication WG 2021-02-16

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 09:15, 16 February 2021 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===== '''Attendees''' ===== * Anne Nerenhausen * Annemieke Vergauwe * Bruno Casneuf * Elhassan Baazizi * Hanne Vuegen * Jan Lenie * Jean-Louis Maggetto * Jens Penny * J...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Attendees
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Annemieke Vergauwe
  • Bruno Casneuf
  • Elhassan Baazizi
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Jan Lenie
  • Jean-Louis Maggetto
  • Jens Penny
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Marc Buckens
  • Richard Franken
  • Tom De Backer
  • Tom Henkens
  • Will Van Norel
Excused
  • Jeroen De Wilde
  • Robin Bosman
  • Nils Devos
Agenda
  • examples of magistral preparations of ingredients/products with codes to distinguish the different types (incl offset)
  • feedback on first draft of logical model for the medication record
Minutes
  • Magistral preparations: Jan has not been able to work on it due to some internal deadlines. Tom Henkens prepared some things on the magistral preparations. See the summary here. Recip-e can prescribe 3 things:
  • pre-packed product
  • INN
  • Compounded drugs/magistral preparation: text as well as structure is permitted
  • structure by defining one or more compounds
  • substances
  • formulary reference
  • pre-packed product (as compound)
  • structure: defined by formulary reference only
  • How to translate this in a model ?
  • How indicate that it is a magistral preparation: as a flag or derive it from one of the used codes, f.e. naming system = BE magistral preparation
  • 1 CNK can point to multiple GTIN, 1 GTIN can never link to multiple CNK's
  • discussion on quantum satis : there seems no need to add this in our FHIR profile
  • do we have to encode this in such a detail ?
  • HL7 FHIR (international): offset is in minutes, so it could be resolved by changing the start date
  • can we put together an example on this ? So that we can point out the need for an extension for it
  • Belgium can also make his own extension for it
  • Draft model for the medication record (we are not going to use the medication scheme as this is a reserved word in Belgium)
  • from architectural update
  • José is using the use cases for the medication record - for which there were some challenges...
  • Context: you can have very simple summaries vs complex summaries
  • medication scheme can be updated by GP, pharmacists, nurse, ... and updates are pushed to vaults
  • what if dispenses are sent to the vault ? is the vault handling the update ? at the vault, the update is put next to the current scheme and GP or pharmacist have to determine which is the right one
  • a compiled summary step might be needed = the need for a process of automated reconciliation will have to be confirmed and if so, defined
  • would/could it be better to work from medication dispenses ?
  • medication record could have the medication summary + details/facts (source data f.e. prescriptions, dispenses, vaccination records, ...)
  • not all the details would be relevant to the summary
  • all dispenses, even when not prescribed, should be part of the medication record
  • Will it be feasible to code all these "facts" ? Only medication related.
  • could it be a solution for a "solid pot" = personal wallet with all information
  • goal is not to implement this right now, but to foresee the possibilities, to make our architecture ready for the future
  • see draft proposal here

Next meeting March 2