Minutes

not updated on https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/hl7-be-fhir-medication/branches/master/medicationrecord-definitions.html yet
treatment item is now treatment line
treatment is not about allergies, is what the doctor prescribes, can be updated by someone else (optional)
treatment consists of treatment lines
treatment lines: do we split this by indication ? TBC
treatment summary: will have lines but different lines, different from what one doctor intended
patient can have different treatments, a treatment can be updated by different doctors
Medication summary can be constructed by a system or by a person
Medication Record has all the data related to usage of medication of a person
who owns the treatment line ? the doctor but it can be updated by other doctors
an indication might be linked to a treatment, it is not mandatory: none to multiple indications are possible
use of word treatment is not correct in its scientific way but is linked to the usage of a medication
How does het Medication Scheme fit here ? José is showing data model of medication record: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/riziv-medication-record/medicationrecord-data-model.html

use case #1: http://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/riziv-medication-record/medicationrecord-scenario-1.html : a medication for 3 different indications ; what does the summary have to show ? is this 3 or 1 treatments ?

Usage statement: here patient can indicate that he doesn't take the medication or that he only takes half of the dose

Remark: the current implementation of the medication scheme is less complex but causes already plenty of issues in the field
Question: do we need 1 central repository ? No, to be discussed in detail next meeting

Action items for next meeting

each one of us to check offline and with his team to continue discussion on treatment lines

Next meeting May 11 at 11AM

Anonymous