Minutes - Medication WG 2021-10-26

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 09:34, 26 October 2021 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Attendees
  • Annemieke Vergauwe
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Bruno Casneuf
  • Jan Lenie
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • Jens Penny
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Marc Buckens
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Richard Francken
  • Tom Henkens
Excused/Not present
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Dieter Sauvillers
  • Elhassan Baazizi
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Jean-Louis Maggetto
  • Jeroen De Wilde
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Katrien Thorré
  • Lars Vanreppelen
  • Nick Hermans
  • Nils Devos
  • Thomas Van Langendonck
  • Tom De Backer
  • Will van Norel
Agenda
  • Work on scenario's
  • Future work items
Minutes
  • Pablo sent 3 scenario's, we discuss them
  • All 3 scenario's are about a twisted ankle
  • do we need to put the indication ? one medication can be taken for multiple indiciations
  • we need a placeholder for the indication, free text - it is mandatory
  • what is the use case ? based on therapautic line
  • Scenario 2: patient has already multiple therapeutic lines
  • chronic backpain
  • twisted ankle: pain relief medication
  • 1 medication on 2 therapeutic lines
  • you don't know what applies to what
  • it is the business question: does one need to add the doses ?
  • Scenario 3: person with a lot of medical history
  • plenty of therapeutic lines
  • do we need to capture the history in the medication scheme ?
  • 3 therapeutic lines that are linked - these are foreseen in the sumehr (as medication history as free text) - do you need to connect the medication ?
  • what will the medication sheme be used for ?
  • there should be a patient friendly print-out for the patient, which will be a different view of the medication scheme
  • history can be of value for GP and pharmacist
  • how will the GP use this ?
  • re-use therapeutic line
  • start new therapeutic line
  • it is not because computer systems keep history eternally that the eternal history has to be displayed - only history that has relevance should be displayed, has to be determined by the application that shows the medication (timeframe, specific datasets, ...)
  • not having the medication history (when manually deleted) today is painful
  • Due to José's absence the questions/open issues have been listed and they will be further discussed during our next meeting

Action items for next meeting Discuss open questions

  • is indication mandatory ?
  • what with multiple indications in multiple therapeutic lines ?
  • how to capture the history in the medication scheme ?

Next meeting Nov 9 at 11AM