Minutes - Population Health WG 2022-11-22

Attendees

• Bart Decuypere
• Brecht Van Vooren
• Hanne Vuegen
• Jean-Michel Polfliet
• Karlien Erauw
• Kurt Dhaene
• Patrick Beyltjens

Excused

• José Costa Teixeira
• Veerle Michiels

Agenda

• Resolution of issues

Minutes

• Rework of Logical model has finished
• Issues overview
• Issue #14: it is a Flemisch screening - how to deal with translations

• content can be translated
• there is no standard translation for the fields but cannot be determined today and will have to be dealt with with end user
• if needed it will be adressed in the guidance

• Issue #13: flow for identification

• sender and receiver have to agree
• sender can give UUID, receiver decides what to do with it and include it when sending info back
• WG agrees with the UUID proposal

• Issue #13: confirm follow up advice

• currently only follow up advice for colon cancer ; there is a snomed CT code for colonoscopy
• follow-up advice for patient if screening has deviating results
• objective is to include follow up advice upon breast cancer screenings ; follow up advice should be aligned with what is written in the letter to the GP/gyn, to check if snomed CT codes exist

• Issue #11: review references to resources

• the references to Be-profiles have to be added wherever appropriate

• Issue #10: actors & transactions

• Kurt is going to prepare the necessary info for next WG meeting

• Issue #9: BeObservation

• Is the rework on the logical model finished, available here: https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/public-health/branches/issue-1/StructureDefinition-BePopulationScreening.html

• the branch is not yet merged (issue #1 branch) so some issues cannot be closed yet
• issue #3: agreed to move to core package - no WG core meeting has been set yet
• issue #6: the WG core has to add a logical model for BePatient
• issue #7: are we going to model the results in the same way as done for the Lab results, see BeObservationLaboratory https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/lab/StructureDefinition-be-observation-laboratory.html, snapshot table and at https://ehealth.fgov.be/standards/fhir/core-clinical/StructureDefinition-be-observation.html, differential table

• mandatory fields: code
• mustSupport fields: language, identifier, status, category, code, (most probably not needed: hasMember, derivedFrom)
• are there LOINC codes for the tests that are being done ?

• the only observation that will be shared is "afwijking", so only code

• recommendation: make it only dependent on BeObservation so the WG core has to add a logical model for BeObservation

• issue #8 nextInvitationIndication: currently there is a text, expectation for the patient when to expect his next appointment

• it seems that there is currently no business need to structure this, it also depends on the advices from SKR

• more investigation has to be done, check now which current "texts" are currently used

• There are some new issues/questions: https://github.com/hl7-be/public-health/issues

Action Items

• resolution of open issues

Date next meeting

• Tuesday 6 Dec at 10AM