Minutes

Context / needs
Determine meeting schedule
Security controls
Literal references in FHIR resources: need for guidelines ? see issue from WG referral (linked to Vitalink/brecht VV)
Position of HL7 Belgium on the FHIR R5 release (to cover the already upcoming questions from players and stakeholders in Belgium)
FHIR readiness of Belgian metahub-hub system: see preparation work

Introduction of the group to the newcomers: everyone comes in as a professional, not linked to his organisation as this group is here to advice towards mature FHIR implementations
Security controls

it has to be compatible with the current access matrix
challenges exist on fetching related resources, so there might be a need for a hierarchy of access (f.e. allowed to fetch a patient and afterwards to fetch an observation)
start google doc with the current access matrix to start analysis what is possible in FHIR and how

draft

Some issues came up in other HL7 Belgium working groups so this group is reconvened since mid December
We have the necessary stakeholders on board: RSW, VZN, Cozo, RSB
It is requested to include the link to the meeting minutes & agenda items in the meeting invites
The purpose of this WG is to create recommendations and best practices, we cannot impose anything. Therefore we will continuously ask for feedback to all stakeholders, in particular the hubs.
We agree to continue working on the items (security controls & litoral references) that were tackled during the last meeting
Security controls : see previous discussion here

link with access matrix which is evolving
security labels in FHIR don't have any hierarchy
we should ask for advice & input before starting specifications towards creating the implementation guide
action item: we/HL7 Belgium have to write out what the situation/technical possibilities and limits exist in FHIR R4 and R5

Anonymous