Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-10-05
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 07:51, 5 October 2023 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs)
Contents
Attendees
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Bart Decuypere
- Félix De Tavernier
- Filoretta Velica
- Hans De Keersmaeker
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Karlien Erauw
Excused
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Hanne Vuegen
- Isabelle Pollet
- Jens Penny
- José Costa Teixeira
- Nick Hermans
- Philippe Baise
- Pablo Christiaens
- Sam Jocqué
- Tom De Backer
- Veerle Michiels
- Walter Bollaert
- Wouter De Jonghe
Agenda
- Review implementation guide and resolve issues/questions
Minutes
- The business rules document version 1.1 can be found here in NL and FR
- The work on the implementation guide has been updated and is presented by Bart
- issue 1 refers to the work on the logical model
- logical model is available here
- if no comments come in, master branch and issue 1 will be merged
- Will the valuesets use SnomedCT ? This needs to be investigated by RIZIV/Anne
- We go over the issues, see here
- issue 14: should we make a link for wills registered elsewhere
- a link can be cumbersome if the link does not work in an emergency case but has advantages ; a link will not be allowed, a scan looks better as all (must be specified, f.e. a pdf)
- the official document is not mandatory, for euthanasia the offical document is at the city level
- organ donation: a scan should be indeed better, as this is not an official document, only an agreement ; Anne will check if we will make this mandatory
- the business rules will describe the situations where the documentscan is preferred
- it would be good to use the format that is used in the lab reports
- do we need to limit the size ? for lab reports the limit to the size is determined by the eHealthBox (10MB)
- this needs to be added in the cookbook after agreement with the vaults
- issue 13: do we need a general representative not linked to one specific Willcode
- this has not yet been investigated by RIZIV, update next meeting
- issue 11: consentscope
- consentscope does not exist in the logical model, there is a valueset though
- Next actions:
- continue resolution of issues & review of IG
Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 19 Oct Sep at 9AM