Minutes - FHIR Validation Group 2024-09-26

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 06:41, 26 September 2024 by JMPolfliet (talk | contribs) (→‎Agenda)

Agenda

  • New Topics
    • Is getTransactionList compatible in FHIR? (Hanne & Veerle)
    • Business rules BeAllergyIntolerance (see github)(Hanne & Veerle)
    • Business rules BeVaccination(Hanne & Veerle)
    • Sumehr in FHIR, clarification for all stakeholders(Hanne & Veerle)
    • What is the flow to add or change a SNOMED CT code? (Veerle)
    • Naming Convention for Logical models (Ilse Dossche)
    • Need for a Published Glossary
    • Diary Notes (linked to Vidis) (Didier Temans - Bart Verbeke)
    • Business Publication on Website eSanté: Document validated by Stakeholders - For Information
      • Next step: Patient Will
    • Note au Commité de Gestion - Remarks and Followup - JM
    • FHIR Governance - Add QA + New steps regarding Commité de Gestion & Reporting - JM & Hanne
    • Request for Publication for Medication - Follow-up - Jose
    • FHIR-a-Thon - JM & Karlien
      • There is a need for Clarification about the different versions for Vaccination in RSW vs Vitalink (Vaccination v2 vs v1)
      • How to deal with the 2 versions: implementation aspect and documentation aspect (Business Documents)
  • Vaccination topics (from Isabelle)
    • Mise à disposition Mapping codes produits et vaccincodes -> Au niveau de la SAM v2 ? Est-ce que cette action est bien prise ne charge ? par qui ? quels sont les délais ?
    • Publication sur le site eHealth standard du Mapping entre CD-VACCINEINDICATION (Kmehr) et vaccincodes (FHIR) -> normalement promis pour la fin du mois de juin 2024 ; ou en est-on ?
  • Reference page for Build/Published Profiles - Meeting with JM & Jose
    • What about generic technical information like versioning, use of security labels, use of identifiers, acces… ?
    • FHIR versioning strategy
      • Versioning of FHIR resources  Is there a validated approach? If yes, where to find? If no, how to continue discussion and where to publish?
      • Versioning of FHIR  How to make a transition to another FHIR version work in the ecosystem? We need a clear documented approach, backwards compatibility,…
    • Changes provided by the workgroup
      • How to handle change requests that are provided by the workgroups?
    • Alivia: question on organizing HL7 workgroups
    • Business Docs must be available when the Release Candidate is ready for Feedback, and must be attached to the communication email
  • Recurring topics
    • Terminology Center Process
    • Data Dictionary Template
    • Datacapabilities Project - Andries
      • Encounter - Trekker: Pablo
    • Allergy - Request for change from Corilus - Ongoing
    • General Rule Core package
    • Unique Identifier
    • Logical Model Lab IG
    • Patient Death Reporting
  • Projects Status
    • Give projects overview for all active projects (Tools related)
    • European Joined Actions feedback
    • Caresets
      • Next steps - Anne
    • Others
  • FHIR Strategy
    • FHIR Versioning Strategy
  • New Projects Proposal
  • New Projects to come
    • Cohbra over FHIR - JM - to be started
  • Other Topics
    • 'Must support' deprecation (from Hanne) - To be discussed
      • I am currently in a meeting for Xt-HER (patient summary workshop) where I hear that the ‘MUST SUPPORT’ classification in HL7 FHIR will be deprecated due to possibility on different interpretations. I know this is not the case yet, and I also know that we are in a earlier FHIR version where it will be in use. But due to these future changes I was wondering if we should keep a focus on this classification for the coming projects. It’s an open question maybe to discuss during the next validation team.
    • Feedback Business Publication (from Hanne) - To be discussed
      • Le KB78 n'existe plus et a été remplacé par la Loi relative à l'exercice des professions des soins de santé du 10 mai 2015 (WUG 2015). Je sais que nous parlons toujours des « KB78'ers » etc., mais je ne sais pas si nous pouvons y faire référence dans une publication formelle ?
      • En effet, les publications actuelles sont mentionnées. Tant pour l'Allergie que pour la Vaccination, une nouvelle version a été proposée pour validation. Ne devrions-nous pas, depuis cette page, faire référence aux ‘releasecandidates ? En principe, toute personne connaissant FHIR (et capable de lire un IG) devrait pouvoir évaluer la valeur des deux IGs. Les pages GitHub me semblent également intéressantes ?
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7belgium.org/index.php?title=Minutes_-_FHIR_Validation_Group_2024-09-26&oldid=3067"