Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-01-10"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
(Created page with "===== Attendees ===== * Anne Nerenhausen * Anthony Maton * Bart Decuypere * Brian Thieren * Brecht Van Vooren * Dominiek Leclerq * Elien De Koker * Hanne Vuegen * Jean-Michel...")
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
* Nick Hermans  
 
* Nick Hermans  
 
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
 
* Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
 +
* Philip Sidgwick
 
* Stef Hoofd
 
* Stef Hoofd
  
 
===== Agenda =====
 
===== Agenda =====
 
* work on patient core profile following up on the raised issues
 
* work on patient core profile following up on the raised issues
* set priorities
+
* set priorities for action items
 
 
  
 
===== Minutes =====
 
===== Minutes =====
 
* We look at the [https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/ issues] that have been raised in other HL7 Belgium working groups  
 
* We look at the [https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/ issues] that have been raised in other HL7 Belgium working groups  
::* We agree to start working on [https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/60 issue 60] BeCommunication & BeDocumentReference
+
* We agree to start working on [https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/60 issue 60] BeCommunication & BeDocumentReference
 
::* Maxime presents the document that was already discussed in the HL7 Belgium WG infrastructure & security
 
::* Maxime presents the document that was already discussed in the HL7 Belgium WG infrastructure & security
 
::::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/60 see here]  
 
::::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/60 see here]  
 
::::* goal is to start with the logical model  
 
::::* goal is to start with the logical model  
 
::::* we look at the int'l profile for document reference, see here: https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/documentreference.html   
 
::::* we look at the int'l profile for document reference, see here: https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/documentreference.html   
::::* author, context and subject seem important for us
+
::::* author, content, context and subject seem important for us
 
+
::::::* facility type is proposed, from/to which facility the document is referenced ; a value set is proposed. WG decides that this is already covered by context.Related ; but there is already an encounter in context
 
+
::::* we determine the scope of the logical model, therefore we discuss the functional need
 
+
::::* do we need a BE profile?
 +
::::::* we do have the need to have some specific elements to store in the vaults
 +
::::* we will call the logical model BeModelPatientDocument, there will no longer be an overlap with BeCommunication
 +
::::::* the reference will be used to store any type of data, including unstructured data
  
 
===== Next agenda meeting agenda points =====
 
===== Next agenda meeting agenda points =====
* Review on proposal to handle patient identifcation in combination with the pseudonymization service
+
* continue work on document reference
 +
* resolution of issues
  
 
===== Next meetings =====
 
===== Next meetings =====
 
* Wednesday 24 Jan at 9AM
 
* Wednesday 24 Jan at 9AM

Latest revision as of 11:12, 10 January 2024

Attendees
  • Anne Nerenhausen
  • Anthony Maton
  • Bart Decuypere
  • Brian Thieren
  • Brecht Van Vooren
  • Dominiek Leclerq
  • Elien De Koker
  • Hanne Vuegen
  • Jean-Michel Polfliet
  • José Costa Teixeira
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Lodewijk Sioen
  • Maxime Caucheteur
  • Philippe Baise
  • Pablo Christiaens
  • Werner De Mulder
Excused/Not present
  • Benny Verhamme
  • Cyprien Janssens
  • Didier Temans
  • Erwin Bellon
  • Félix De Tavernier
  • Filoretta Velica
  • Isabelle Pollet
  • Marco Busschots
  • Nick Hermans
  • Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
  • Philip Sidgwick
  • Stef Hoofd
Agenda
  • work on patient core profile following up on the raised issues
  • set priorities for action items
Minutes
  • We look at the issues that have been raised in other HL7 Belgium working groups
  • We agree to start working on issue 60 BeCommunication & BeDocumentReference
  • Maxime presents the document that was already discussed in the HL7 Belgium WG infrastructure & security
  • facility type is proposed, from/to which facility the document is referenced ; a value set is proposed. WG decides that this is already covered by context.Related ; but there is already an encounter in context
  • we determine the scope of the logical model, therefore we discuss the functional need
  • do we need a BE profile?
  • we do have the need to have some specific elements to store in the vaults
  • we will call the logical model BeModelPatientDocument, there will no longer be an overlap with BeCommunication
  • the reference will be used to store any type of data, including unstructured data
Next agenda meeting agenda points
  • continue work on document reference
  • resolution of issues
Next meetings
  • Wednesday 24 Jan at 9AM