Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-01-10"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===== Agenda ===== | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
* work on patient core profile following up on the raised issues | * work on patient core profile following up on the raised issues | ||
| − | * set priorities | + | * set priorities for action items |
| − | |||
===== Minutes ===== | ===== Minutes ===== | ||
| Line 44: | Line 43: | ||
::::* we look at the int'l profile for document reference, see here: https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/documentreference.html | ::::* we look at the int'l profile for document reference, see here: https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/documentreference.html | ||
::::* author, content, context and subject seem important for us | ::::* author, content, context and subject seem important for us | ||
| − | ::::::* facility type is proposed, from/to which facility the document is referenced ; a value set is proposed. WG decides that this is already covered by context.Related | + | ::::::* facility type is proposed, from/to which facility the document is referenced ; a value set is proposed. WG decides that this is already covered by context.Related ; but there is already an encounter in context |
| − | ::::* we determine the scope of the logical model, therefore we discuss | + | ::::* we determine the scope of the logical model, therefore we discuss the functional need |
| − | ::::::* | + | ::::* do we need a BE profile? |
| + | ::::::* we do have the need to have some specific elements to store in the vaults | ||
| + | ::::* we will call the logical model BeModelPatientDocument, there will no longer be an overlap with BeCommunication | ||
| + | ::::::* the reference will be used to store any type of data, including unstructured data | ||
===== Next agenda meeting agenda points ===== | ===== Next agenda meeting agenda points ===== | ||
Revision as of 09:32, 10 January 2024
Contents
Attendees
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Anthony Maton
- Bart Decuypere
- Brian Thieren
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Dominiek Leclerq
- Elien De Koker
- Hanne Vuegen
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Karlien Erauw
- Lodewijk Sioen
- Maxime Caucheteur
- Philippe Baise
- Pablo Christiaens
- Werner De Mulder
Excused/Not present
- Benny Verhamme
- Cyprien Janssens
- Didier Temans
- Erwin Bellon
- Félix De Tavernier
- Filoretta Velica
- Isabelle Pollet
- Marco Busschots
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Philip Sidgwick
- Stef Hoofd
Agenda
- work on patient core profile following up on the raised issues
- set priorities for action items
Minutes
- We look at the issues that have been raised in other HL7 Belgium working groups
- We agree to start working on issue 60 BeCommunication & BeDocumentReference
- Maxime presents the document that was already discussed in the HL7 Belgium WG infrastructure & security
- see here
- goal is to start with the logical model
- we look at the int'l profile for document reference, see here: https://hl7.org/fhir/R4/documentreference.html
- author, content, context and subject seem important for us
- facility type is proposed, from/to which facility the document is referenced ; a value set is proposed. WG decides that this is already covered by context.Related ; but there is already an encounter in context
- we determine the scope of the logical model, therefore we discuss the functional need
- do we need a BE profile?
- we do have the need to have some specific elements to store in the vaults
- we will call the logical model BeModelPatientDocument, there will no longer be an overlap with BeCommunication
- the reference will be used to store any type of data, including unstructured data
Next agenda meeting agenda points
- Review on proposal to handle patient identifcation in combination with the pseudonymization service
Next meetings
- Wednesday 24 Jan at 9AM
