Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-01-24"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
===== Agenda ===== | ===== Agenda ===== | ||
− | * work on | + | * continue work on document references |
− | * | + | * resolution of other issues |
===== Minutes ===== | ===== Minutes ===== | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
::::* we could add that we expect a mime-type to be present | ::::* we could add that we expect a mime-type to be present | ||
::* examples from NIC would be useful | ::* examples from NIC would be useful | ||
− | ::* logical model will be put together | + | ::* logical model will be put together as well as profile/IB |
+ | ::::* could NIC create its own NIC profile based on the BE profile, that could be done with the WG payment | ||
+ | * Some of the issues are linked to NIC publications so we need to look at them | ||
+ | ::* https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/41 | ||
+ | ::::* add pharmacy invoicing office in the core package as addition to a value set | ||
+ | ::::* this will also resolve issue 46 and 47 | ||
+ | ::::* the WG agrees | ||
+ | ::* https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/49 | ||
+ | ::::* add RIZIV nomenclatuur NamingSystem to core profile | ||
+ | ::::* the WG agrees | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::* https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/52 | ||
+ | ::::* the aim of an annotation datatype is often used in the note field | ||
+ | ::::* there is a need in the referral project (for lab project an ad hoc solution was created) to clarify the different types of notes | ||
+ | ::::* annotations might not be ideal in FHIR | ||
+ | ::::* we look at the proposed code : github.com/hl7-be/core/pull/53/files | ||
+ | ::::* we agree on this, if the context of the extension is changed to Annotation, issue remains open as an additional check on extension will be done | ||
===== Next agenda meeting agenda points ===== | ===== Next agenda meeting agenda points ===== | ||
− | * continue work on document reference | + | * continue work on document reference, review logical model |
* resolution of issues | * resolution of issues | ||
===== Next meetings ===== | ===== Next meetings ===== | ||
* Wednesday 7 February at 9AM | * Wednesday 7 February at 9AM |
Latest revision as of 09:05, 24 January 2024
Contents
Attendees
- Anthony Maton
- Bart Decuypere
- Benny Verhamme
- Brian Thieren
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Dominiek Leclerq
- Elien De Koker
- Hanne Vuegen
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Karlien Erauw
- Maxime Caucheteur
- Philippe Baise
- Philip Sidgwick
- Pablo Christiaens
- Steven Van den Berghe
Excused/Not present
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Cyprien Janssens
- Didier Temans
- Erwin Bellon
- Félix De Tavernier
- Filoretta Velica
- Isabelle Pollet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Lodewijk Sioen
- Marco Busschots
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Stef Hoofd
- Werner De Mulder
Agenda
- continue work on document references
- resolution of other issues
Minutes
- We look at the issues that have been raised in other HL7 Belgium working groups
- We agree to start working on issue 60 BeCommunication & BeDocumentReference
- NIC is in particular interested in BeCommunication
- hospitals are interested so send RIZIV documents/forms, currently sent by normal post, in a digital way ; some are information only, some have to be checked by OA/VIs. There are 100/200 different forms, linked to regulations. Purpose is to transfer the PDF version of the form in a digital way to the OA/VI. Pdf would be the scanned version of the original form. ePDF would be used. 3 levels of categories would be added (A, B and C). The category would identify the paper document and would determine. Hospitals will need to categorize all the forms that they send. A common taxonomy would have to be defined for all categories (together with RIZIV). some of the documents have to be signed by the patient (accepting the rules, treatment). For this a way has to be found to transfer the signed document. This is not a FHIR document.
- the subject would be the patient
- form would be send one by one, related to one patient, not as a bundle which would use up a lot of resources
- use of contained resources is considered
- there is an attester field at FHIR resource level, which could also be used if a new signed version is available
- needs from other project (Maxime) needs author, content, context and subject seem important for us
- is the practioner an author?
- we look at issue 60 and identify the needs for NIC
- there would only be pdf as document reference for NIC
- needs: patient, RIZIV hospital/practioner as author, category
- we could add that we expect a mime-type to be present
- examples from NIC would be useful
- logical model will be put together as well as profile/IB
- could NIC create its own NIC profile based on the BE profile, that could be done with the WG payment
- Some of the issues are linked to NIC publications so we need to look at them
-
- add pharmacy invoicing office in the core package as addition to a value set
- this will also resolve issue 46 and 47
- the WG agrees
-
-
- add RIZIV nomenclatuur NamingSystem to core profile
- the WG agrees
-
-
- the aim of an annotation datatype is often used in the note field
- there is a need in the referral project (for lab project an ad hoc solution was created) to clarify the different types of notes
- annotations might not be ideal in FHIR
- we look at the proposed code : github.com/hl7-be/core/pull/53/files
- we agree on this, if the context of the extension is changed to Annotation, issue remains open as an additional check on extension will be done
-
Next agenda meeting agenda points
- continue work on document reference, review logical model
- resolution of issues
Next meetings
- Wednesday 7 February at 9AM