Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-01-24
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 08:13, 24 January 2024 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "===== Attendees ===== * Anthony Maton * Bart Decuypere * Benny Verhamme * Brian Thieren * Brecht Van Vooren * Dominiek Leclerq * Elien De Koker * Hanne Vuegen * Jean-Michel...")
Contents
Attendees
- Anthony Maton
- Bart Decuypere
- Benny Verhamme
- Brian Thieren
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Dominiek Leclerq
- Elien De Koker
- Hanne Vuegen
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Karlien Erauw
- Maxime Caucheteur
- Philippe Baise
- Philip Sidgwick
- Pablo Christiaens
- Steven Van den Berge
Excused/Not present
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Cyprien Janssens
- Didier Temans
- Erwin Bellon
- Félix De Tavernier
- Filoretta Velica
- Isabelle Pollet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Lodewijk Sioen
- Marco Busschots
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Stef Hoofd
- Werner De Mulder
Agenda
- work on patient core profile following up on the raised issues
- set priorities for action items
Minutes
- We look at the issues that have been raised in other HL7 Belgium working groups
- We agree to start working on issue 60 BeCommunication & BeDocumentReference
- NIC is in particular interested in BeCommunication
- hospitals are interested so send RIZIV documents/forms, currently sent by normal post, in a digital way ; some are information only, some have to be checked by OA/VIs. There are 100/200 different forms, linked to regulations. Purpose is to transfer the PDF version of the form in a digital way to the OA/VI. Pdf would be the scanned version of the original form. ePDF would be used. 3 levels of categories would be added (A, B and C). The category would identify the paper document and would determine. Hospitals will need to categorize all the forms that they send. A common taxonomy would have to be defined for all categories (together with RIZIV). some of the documents have to be signed by the patient (accepting the rules, treatment). For this a way has to be found to transfer the signed document.
- needs from other project (Maxime) needs author, content, context and subject seem important for us
- is the practioner an author
- facility type is proposed, from/to which facility the document is referenced ; a value set is proposed. WG decides that this is already covered by context.Related ; but there is already an encounter in context
- we determine the scope of the logical model, therefore we discuss the functional need
- do we need a BE profile?
- we do have the need to have some specific elements to store in the vaults
- we will call the logical model BeModelPatientDocument, there will no longer be an overlap with BeCommunication
- the reference will be used to store any type of data, including unstructured data
Next agenda meeting agenda points
- continue work on document reference
- resolution of issues
Next meetings
- Wednesday 7 February at 9AM