Minutes - Core Profiles WG 2024-01-24
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Revision as of 08:43, 24 January 2024 by KarlienErauw (talk | contribs)
Contents
Attendees
- Anthony Maton
- Bart Decuypere
- Benny Verhamme
- Brian Thieren
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Dominiek Leclerq
- Elien De Koker
- Hanne Vuegen
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Karlien Erauw
- Maxime Caucheteur
- Philippe Baise
- Philip Sidgwick
- Pablo Christiaens
- Steven Van den Berghe
Excused/Not present
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Cyprien Janssens
- Didier Temans
- Erwin Bellon
- Félix De Tavernier
- Filoretta Velica
- Isabelle Pollet
- José Costa Teixeira
- Lodewijk Sioen
- Marco Busschots
- Nick Hermans
- Nico Vannieuwenhuyze
- Stef Hoofd
- Werner De Mulder
Agenda
- work on patient core profile following up on the raised issues
- set priorities for action items
Minutes
- We look at the issues that have been raised in other HL7 Belgium working groups
- We agree to start working on issue 60 BeCommunication & BeDocumentReference
- NIC is in particular interested in BeCommunication
- hospitals are interested so send RIZIV documents/forms, currently sent by normal post, in a digital way ; some are information only, some have to be checked by OA/VIs. There are 100/200 different forms, linked to regulations. Purpose is to transfer the PDF version of the form in a digital way to the OA/VI. Pdf would be the scanned version of the original form. ePDF would be used. 3 levels of categories would be added (A, B and C). The category would identify the paper document and would determine. Hospitals will need to categorize all the forms that they send. A common taxonomy would have to be defined for all categories (together with RIZIV). some of the documents have to be signed by the patient (accepting the rules, treatment). For this a way has to be found to transfer the signed document. This is not a FHIR document.
- the subject would be the patient
- form would be send one by one, related to one patient, not as a bundle which would use up a lot of resources
- use of contained resources is considered
- there is an attester field at FHIR resource level, which could also be used if a new signed version is available
- needs from other project (Maxime) needs author, content, context and subject seem important for us
- is the practioner an author?
- we look at issue 60 and identify the needs for NIC
- there would only be pdf as document reference for NIC
- needs: patient, RIZIV hospital/practioner as author, category
- we could add that we expect a mime-type to be present
- examples from NIC would be useful
- logical model will be put together
Next agenda meeting agenda points
- continue work on document reference
- resolution of issues
Next meetings
- Wednesday 7 February at 9AM