Difference between revisions of "Minutes - IHE Belgium Medical Imaging Workgroup WG 2022-10-17"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=== Attendees ===
 
=== Attendees ===
 
* Ann Deroose, Agfa
 
* Ann Deroose, Agfa
* Arnould Geelhand De Merxem
+
* Arnould Geelhand De Merxem, UZ Brussel
 
* Bruno Laffin, Agfa
 
* Bruno Laffin, Agfa
 
* Christophe Martens, Agfa
 
* Christophe Martens, Agfa
 
* Erwin Bellon, UZ Leuven
 
* Erwin Bellon, UZ Leuven
* Filip Rommelaere, Siemens
+
* Filip Rommelaere, Siemens Healthineers
* Jargo op 't Root, Sectro
+
* Jargo op 't Root, Sectra
 
* Karlien Erauw, Agoria/IHE Belgium vendors co-chair
 
* Karlien Erauw, Agoria/IHE Belgium vendors co-chair
 +
* Katleen Smedts, UZ Antwerpen
 
* Manu Vermeire, Agfa
 
* Manu Vermeire, Agfa
 
* Pieter Devolder, IHE Belgium users co-chair/UZ Gent
 
* Pieter Devolder, IHE Belgium users co-chair/UZ Gent
 
* Sébastien Jodogne, UC Louvain
 
* Sébastien Jodogne, UC Louvain
 
* Simone van Troost, Sectra
 
* Simone van Troost, Sectra
* Toon Van de Ven
+
* Toon Van de Ven, Siemens Healthineers
 
* Werner De Mulder, Amaron
 
* Werner De Mulder, Amaron
 
* Wim Op de Beeck, Philips
 
* Wim Op de Beeck, Philips
Line 37: Line 38:
  
 
* A use case has been moved forward by some users : "ensure that a caregiver (f.e. radiologist) can access all available medical images of a patient within his own software/workstation as part of the patient's treatment plan"
 
* A use case has been moved forward by some users : "ensure that a caregiver (f.e. radiologist) can access all available medical images of a patient within his own software/workstation as part of the patient's treatment plan"
::* can this use case be validated ? basic requirements have to be clearly set out
+
::* can this use case be validated ? basic functional requirements have to be clearly set out by the users first
::* do we have to look for a solution for pathologists ?
+
::* do we have to include a solution for pathologists ?
::* are enough users represented: do we need users from the southern and Brussels part of Belgium ?
+
::* are there sufficient users represented: do we need users from the southern and Brussels part of Belgium ?
 
::* do we have to invite people from the hubs ?
 
::* do we have to invite people from the hubs ?
* Users will have to define the use case that will have to be validated across Belgian hospitals
+
* Users will start defining the use case & functional requirements that will have to be validated across Belgian hospitals
* Goal is to be minimum invasive in the architecture
+
::* Goal is to be minimum invasive in the architecture, taking into account the users' functional requirements and the legal scene
  
* Next meeting schedule: biweekly on Mondays at 1PM - next Monday Oct 31 is bfeore a Belgian holiday - meet in  
+
* Next meeting: Monday 5 Dec at 1PM - users meeting will happen in between
3 weeks TBC 
 
  
 
=== Action Items ===
 
=== Action Items ===
* Alain will share a [https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/114JjB1LqDyVJZdyvY4KAq8BuoFIJIABx whitepaper with the WG members, you can find it here]
+
* Users to define use case & functional requirements - users meetings will be set-up as from next Monday
 +
* The WG that includes the vendors will be re-activated on Monday 5 Dec at 1PM
  
 
=== Next meeting ===
 
=== Next meeting ===
* Monday 7 Nov 1PM - in 3 weeks due ??? to the Belgian holiday on Nov 1- meetings will happen biweekly online
+
* Monday 5 Dec 1PM

Latest revision as of 12:46, 17 October 2022

Attendees

  • Ann Deroose, Agfa
  • Arnould Geelhand De Merxem, UZ Brussel
  • Bruno Laffin, Agfa
  • Christophe Martens, Agfa
  • Erwin Bellon, UZ Leuven
  • Filip Rommelaere, Siemens Healthineers
  • Jargo op 't Root, Sectra
  • Karlien Erauw, Agoria/IHE Belgium vendors co-chair
  • Katleen Smedts, UZ Antwerpen
  • Manu Vermeire, Agfa
  • Pieter Devolder, IHE Belgium users co-chair/UZ Gent
  • Sébastien Jodogne, UC Louvain
  • Simone van Troost, Sectra
  • Toon Van de Ven, Siemens Healthineers
  • Werner De Mulder, Amaron
  • Wim Op de Beeck, Philips

Excused

  • Alain Fraynal
  • Amélie Dendooven
  • An-Katrien De Roo
  • Chayma Zaafouri
  • Koen Vergote
  • Maarten Clinckaert
  • Nick Hermans
  • Stijn Rabaey

Agenda

  • Round table
  • Determine use case
  • Determine action items

Minutes

  • Round table: everyone presents him/herself & his/her interests
  • Philips and Sectra have joined thanks to Erwin
  • Thank you to Alain for sharing the whitepaper
  • A use case has been moved forward by some users : "ensure that a caregiver (f.e. radiologist) can access all available medical images of a patient within his own software/workstation as part of the patient's treatment plan"
  • can this use case be validated ? basic functional requirements have to be clearly set out by the users first
  • do we have to include a solution for pathologists ?
  • are there sufficient users represented: do we need users from the southern and Brussels part of Belgium ?
  • do we have to invite people from the hubs ?
  • Users will start defining the use case & functional requirements that will have to be validated across Belgian hospitals
  • Goal is to be minimum invasive in the architecture, taking into account the users' functional requirements and the legal scene
  • Next meeting: Monday 5 Dec at 1PM - users meeting will happen in between

Action Items

  • Users to define use case & functional requirements - users meetings will be set-up as from next Monday
  • The WG that includes the vendors will be re-activated on Monday 5 Dec at 1PM

Next meeting

  • Monday 5 Dec 1PM