Difference between revisions of "Minutes - IHE Belgium Medical Imaging Workgroup WG 2022-10-17"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* A use case has been moved forward by some users : "ensure that a caregiver (f.e. radiologist) can access all available medical images of a patient within his own software/workstation as part of the patient's treatment plan" | * A use case has been moved forward by some users : "ensure that a caregiver (f.e. radiologist) can access all available medical images of a patient within his own software/workstation as part of the patient's treatment plan" | ||
− | ::* can this use case be validated ? basic requirements have to be clearly set out | + | ::* can this use case be validated ? basic functional requirements have to be clearly set out by the users first |
− | ::* do we have to | + | ::* do we have to include a solution for pathologists ? |
− | ::* are | + | ::* are there sufficient users represented: do we need users from the southern and Brussels part of Belgium ? |
::* do we have to invite people from the hubs ? | ::* do we have to invite people from the hubs ? | ||
− | * Users will | + | * Users will start defining the use case & functional requirements that will have to be validated across Belgian hospitals |
− | * Goal is to be minimum invasive in the architecture, taking into account the users' functional requirements and the legal scene | + | ::* Goal is to be minimum invasive in the architecture, taking into account the users' functional requirements and the legal scene |
− | + | * Next meeting: Monday 5 Dec at 1PM - users meeting will happen in between | |
− | |||
− | * Next meeting | ||
− | |||
=== Action Items === | === Action Items === | ||
− | * | + | * Users to define use case & functional requirements - users meetings will be set-up as from next Monday |
+ | * The WG that includes the vendors will be re-activated on Monday 5 Dec at 1PM | ||
=== Next meeting === | === Next meeting === | ||
− | * Monday | + | * Monday 5 Dec 1PM e |
Revision as of 12:44, 17 October 2022
Attendees
- Ann Deroose, Agfa
- Arnould Geelhand De Merxem
- Bruno Laffin, Agfa
- Christophe Martens, Agfa
- Erwin Bellon, UZ Leuven
- Filip Rommelaere, Siemens
- Jargo op 't Root, Sectro
- Karlien Erauw, Agoria/IHE Belgium vendors co-chair
- Manu Vermeire, Agfa
- Pieter Devolder, IHE Belgium users co-chair/UZ Gent
- Sébastien Jodogne, UC Louvain
- Simone van Troost, Sectra
- Toon Van de Ven
- Werner De Mulder, Amaron
- Wim Op de Beeck, Philips
Excused
- Alain Fraynal
- Amélie Dendooven
- An-Katrien De Roo
- Chayma Zaafouri
- Koen Vergote
- Maarten Clinckaert
- Nick Hermans
- Stijn Rabaey
Agenda
- Round table
- Determine use case
- Determine action items
Minutes
- Round table: everyone presents him/herself & his/her interests
- Philips and Sectra have joined thanks to Erwin
- Thank you to Alain for sharing the whitepaper
- A use case has been moved forward by some users : "ensure that a caregiver (f.e. radiologist) can access all available medical images of a patient within his own software/workstation as part of the patient's treatment plan"
- can this use case be validated ? basic functional requirements have to be clearly set out by the users first
- do we have to include a solution for pathologists ?
- are there sufficient users represented: do we need users from the southern and Brussels part of Belgium ?
- do we have to invite people from the hubs ?
- Users will start defining the use case & functional requirements that will have to be validated across Belgian hospitals
- Goal is to be minimum invasive in the architecture, taking into account the users' functional requirements and the legal scene
- Next meeting: Monday 5 Dec at 1PM - users meeting will happen in between
Action Items
- Users to define use case & functional requirements - users meetings will be set-up as from next Monday
- The WG that includes the vendors will be re-activated on Monday 5 Dec at 1PM
Next meeting
- Monday 5 Dec 1PM e