Difference between revisions of "Minutes - IHE Belgium Medical Imaging Workgroup WG 2022-12-05"

From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
Line 30: Line 30:
 
* Determine action items
 
* Determine action items
  
==See work =
+
== Minutes ===
 
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ovxR0X62sn_kjjfrEVb6FPhsJNgtj3Vf772TsfbN_ck/edit#heading=h.6ms7hgklgqph See work here]  
 
* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ovxR0X62sn_kjjfrEVb6FPhsJNgtj3Vf772TsfbN_ck/edit#heading=h.6ms7hgklgqph See work here]  
 
* We have to take the Belgian ecosystem into account when thinking about the architecture
 
* We have to take the Belgian ecosystem into account when thinking about the architecture
 
* Please note that the work is still in brainstorming ideas modus  
 
* Please note that the work is still in brainstorming ideas modus  
 
::* Pieter is showing the [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/18pYiKByvyt3DrPESVbigioZ8we15xf_7/edit#slide=id.p1 scheme that is part of the brainstorm]
 
::* Pieter is showing the [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/18pYiKByvyt3DrPESVbigioZ8we15xf_7/edit#slide=id.p1 scheme that is part of the brainstorm]
* What patient ID will be used ?
 
  
 
* A use case has been moved forward by some users : "ensure that a caregiver (f.e. radiologist) can access all available medical images of a patient within his own software/workstation as part of the patient's treatment plan"
 
::* can this use case be validated ?
 
::* do we have to look for a solution for pathologists ?
 
 
* As a starting point we take a look at the current [https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Import_and_Display_of_External_Priors IHE Profile IDEP] and [https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/Radiology/IHE_RAD_Suppl_IDEP_Rev1-0_PC_2019-02-20.pdf Import and Display of External Priors] : can the first steps of the diagram be the first steps ?
 
  
 
* The users will continue their work
 
* The users will continue their work
Line 49: Line 42:
 
=== Action Items ===
 
=== Action Items ===
 
* Users will reconvene on a regular basis to continue to work
 
* Users will reconvene on a regular basis to continue to work
 +
* All: please review the document and provide your feedback (edit access to document will be provided upon simple request)
  
 
=== Next meeting ===
 
=== Next meeting ===
 
* Next users/vendors meeting on Monday 23 Jan Dec 1PM - meetings will happen biweekly online
 
* Next users/vendors meeting on Monday 23 Jan Dec 1PM - meetings will happen biweekly online

Revision as of 13:18, 5 December 2022

Attendees

  • Alain Fraynal
  • Arnould Geelhand De Merxem
  • Erwin Bellon
  • Filip Rommelaere
  • Jargo op 't Root
  • Karlien Erauw
  • Katleen Smedts
  • Maarten Clinckaert
  • Manu Vermeire
  • Pieter Devolder
  • Ron Marinusse
  • Simone van Troost
  • Werner De Mulder
  • Wim Op de Beeck

Excused / Absent

  • Amélie Dendooven
  • An-Katrien De Roo
  • Ann Deroose
  • Chayma Zaafouri
  • Koen Vergote
  • Nick Hermans
  • Sébastien Jodogne
  • Stijn Rabaey
  • Toon Van de Ven

Agenda

  • Update of users work
  • Determine action items

Minutes =

  • See work here
  • We have to take the Belgian ecosystem into account when thinking about the architecture
  • Please note that the work is still in brainstorming ideas modus


  • The users will continue their work
  • This group that includes the vendors will be reconvened in a couple of weeks

Action Items

  • Users will reconvene on a regular basis to continue to work
  • All: please review the document and provide your feedback (edit access to document will be provided upon simple request)

Next meeting

  • Next users/vendors meeting on Monday 23 Jan Dec 1PM - meetings will happen biweekly online