Difference between revisions of "Minutes - Patient Dossier WG 2023-08-24"
From Health Level 7 Belgium Wiki
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) (Created page with "draft / to be reworked === Attendees === * Anne Nerenhausen * Bart Decuypere * Félix De Tavernier * Isabelle Pollet * Jean-Michel Polfliet * Jens Penny * José Costa Teixei...") |
KarlienErauw (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
=== Attendees === | === Attendees === | ||
* Anne Nerenhausen | * Anne Nerenhausen | ||
+ | * Alexis Van Zeveren | ||
* Bart Decuypere | * Bart Decuypere | ||
* Félix De Tavernier | * Félix De Tavernier | ||
− | * | + | * Hanne Vuegen |
+ | * Hans De Keersmaeker | ||
* Jean-Michel Polfliet | * Jean-Michel Polfliet | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* Karlien Erauw | * Karlien Erauw | ||
* Pablo Christiaens | * Pablo Christiaens | ||
− | * | + | * Sam Jocqué |
=== Excused === | === Excused === | ||
− | |||
* Brecht Van Vooren | * Brecht Van Vooren | ||
* Filoretta Velica | * Filoretta Velica | ||
− | * | + | * Isabelle Pollet |
− | * | + | * Jens Penny |
+ | * José Costa Teixeira | ||
* Nick Hermans | * Nick Hermans | ||
* Philippe Baise | * Philippe Baise | ||
− | |||
* Tom De Backer | * Tom De Backer | ||
+ | * Veerle Michiels | ||
* Walter Bollaert | * Walter Bollaert | ||
=== Agenda === | === Agenda === | ||
− | * Review business rules document | + | * Review business rules document & resolve issue/questions |
=== Minutes === | === Minutes === | ||
* A new version of the business rules document has been distributed to the WG members last Monday [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QGEKMd4OkXJRIr-EC2qeaqg84Bw5G7gj/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=105469359652835948544&rtpof=true&sd=true in NL] and [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Avg27yw7gJB0KqfOhqh5vLsj2187Y8e-/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=105469359652835948544&rtpof=true&sd=true French]: | * A new version of the business rules document has been distributed to the WG members last Monday [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QGEKMd4OkXJRIr-EC2qeaqg84Bw5G7gj/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=105469359652835948544&rtpof=true&sd=true in NL] and [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Avg27yw7gJB0KqfOhqh5vLsj2187Y8e-/edit?usp=drive_link&ouid=105469359652835948544&rtpof=true&sd=true French]: | ||
+ | ::* see also in [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/12 issue 12] | ||
+ | ::* we go briefly over the document | ||
+ | ::* please have a look at the document and raise your questions or remarks by next meeting | ||
+ | * The work on the implementation guide has started | ||
+ | ::* [https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/patientwill/branches/issue-1/ issue 1 refers to the work on the logical model] | ||
+ | * We deal with the questions raised in [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues issues, see here] | ||
+ | ::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/11 issue 11]: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode | ||
+ | ::::* the will code will be made mandatory in the logical model as this corresponds with the most important information, it corresponds with consent provision code in FHIR | ||
+ | ::::* [https://hl7.org/FHIR/R4/valueset-consent-scope.html the category is FHIR int'l model] is mandatory and is very similar to scope | ||
+ | ::::* more investigation is necessary by eHealth platform | ||
− | -- | + | ::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/10 issue 10]: performer vs organisation |
+ | ::::* the representative (mandaathouder) is in the logical model but not in the IG yet --> it is the custodian | ||
+ | ::::* where do we get the INSZ number for a notary/judge ? | ||
+ | ::::* do we need another type of representative ? trusted person? | ||
+ | ::::* can the custodian be the same person as the performer ? normally not | ||
+ | ::::* concepts need to be clarified by INAMI | ||
− | + | ::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/9 issue 9]: update/remove links to artefacts | |
− | + | ::::* it is a temporary version of the IG, the links will be updated by eHealth platform | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ::* | + | ::* [https://github.com/hl7-be/patientwill/issues/8 issue 8]: kmehr/FHIR mapping |
− | ::::* | + | ::::* for all existing documents in kmehr and the valuesets used there, a mapping to the FHIR valuesets is needed |
− | ::::* | + | ::::* how are we going to tackle this ? |
− | :: | + | ::::::* see 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 in the business rules WillCategory and WillCode |
− | ::::* | + | ::::::* we will only add values to the existing kmehr values |
− | ::::* | + | ::::::::* it seems that some kmehr values have been removed and some have not been mapped |
− | ::::* kmehr | + | ::::* the mapping will be present in the business rules document |
− | + | ::::::* where will the mapping be made available ? | |
− | |||
− | ::* | ||
− | * | + | * royal decree stated to implement the advance cared planning by July but this is not feasible, will be for next year |
− | + | * There is a need to have a complete overview of how caresets will have to be exchanged in the Belgian eHealth ecosystem. This is out of scope of this WG but will need to be tackled. | |
− | + | ||
* Next actions: | * Next actions: | ||
− | ::* come prepared with | + | ::* come prepared with remarks on the updated business rules document and first draft of logical model by 7 Sep |
::* once the Royal Decree and other relevant documents (brochure) are available, they will be distributed to the WG members | ::* once the Royal Decree and other relevant documents (brochure) are available, they will be distributed to the WG members | ||
− | '''Next Patient Dossier WG meeting: 7 Sep at 9AM | + | '''Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 7 Sep at 9AM''' |
Latest revision as of 08:26, 24 August 2023
Contents
Attendees
- Anne Nerenhausen
- Alexis Van Zeveren
- Bart Decuypere
- Félix De Tavernier
- Hanne Vuegen
- Hans De Keersmaeker
- Jean-Michel Polfliet
- Karlien Erauw
- Pablo Christiaens
- Sam Jocqué
Excused
- Brecht Van Vooren
- Filoretta Velica
- Isabelle Pollet
- Jens Penny
- José Costa Teixeira
- Nick Hermans
- Philippe Baise
- Tom De Backer
- Veerle Michiels
- Walter Bollaert
Agenda
- Review business rules document & resolve issue/questions
Minutes
- A new version of the business rules document has been distributed to the WG members last Monday in NL and French:
- see also in issue 12
- we go briefly over the document
- please have a look at the document and raise your questions or remarks by next meeting
- The work on the implementation guide has started
- We deal with the questions raised in issues, see here
- issue 11: consent.scope relation vs consent.provisioncode
- the will code will be made mandatory in the logical model as this corresponds with the most important information, it corresponds with consent provision code in FHIR
- the category is FHIR int'l model is mandatory and is very similar to scope
- more investigation is necessary by eHealth platform
- issue 10: performer vs organisation
- the representative (mandaathouder) is in the logical model but not in the IG yet --> it is the custodian
- where do we get the INSZ number for a notary/judge ?
- do we need another type of representative ? trusted person?
- can the custodian be the same person as the performer ? normally not
- concepts need to be clarified by INAMI
- issue 9: update/remove links to artefacts
- it is a temporary version of the IG, the links will be updated by eHealth platform
- issue 8: kmehr/FHIR mapping
- for all existing documents in kmehr and the valuesets used there, a mapping to the FHIR valuesets is needed
- how are we going to tackle this ?
- see 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 in the business rules WillCategory and WillCode
- we will only add values to the existing kmehr values
- it seems that some kmehr values have been removed and some have not been mapped
- the mapping will be present in the business rules document
- where will the mapping be made available ?
- royal decree stated to implement the advance cared planning by July but this is not feasible, will be for next year
- There is a need to have a complete overview of how caresets will have to be exchanged in the Belgian eHealth ecosystem. This is out of scope of this WG but will need to be tackled.
- Next actions:
- come prepared with remarks on the updated business rules document and first draft of logical model by 7 Sep
- once the Royal Decree and other relevant documents (brochure) are available, they will be distributed to the WG members
Next Patient Dossier/Patient Will WG meeting: 7 Sep at 9AM